# Astrophysicist Disputes CO2's Climate Impact and Criticizes the IPCC - Original post: https://www.twitter.com/i/status/2117361460837769684 - Source account: [@dejanirasilveir](https://x.com/dejanirasilveir) - Source language: English - Duration: 2:20 - Published: 2026-11-03 - Canonical URL: https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc ## Transcript [0:00](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc) He soon has been thinking about this for a long time. [0:03](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=3) He's an astrophysicist, a geoscientist. He spent thirty-one years at Harvard. [0:08](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=8) The world is full of untruth and half-truths, right? [0:10](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=10) That's the whole problem, right? That's why for so long, even the idea that we are not limited and bounded by availability of, uh, let's say gasoline, petroleum or, or coal. Coal now they won't allow us to use, right? As you know, in COP meeting in Dubai, they just physically declare themselves that we should stop using fossil fuel, [0:29](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=29) basically petroleum, natural gas, and even coal. [0:33](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=33) I mean, these people are insane now, really insane. [0:36](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=36) What we know now is CO2 ain't gonna cost nothing. It's not gonna change much of the climatic system, which mean it won't change the speed of the hurricane, it won't change, uh, how fast or how frequent tornado form. [0:50](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=50) It won't f-- it, it won't even actually make any difference to the polar bear population. It's all conservation issue, right, on polar bear. [0:57](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=57) It won't even cause how much fish you don't catch or catch, you know? [1:00](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=60) It won't even cause what they call ocean acidification. [1:02](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=62) It won't even cause this problem that they claim. It's all artificial. [1:06](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=66) Everything they do is all dream from their model and the tyranny of the few again. That those few people just dream up this scary story that it just ain't true. [1:17](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=77) My view is that the UN IPCC, United Nation Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is one of the primary problem, which mean they have been misleading people. [1:27](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=87) They've been using authority of science, which is not true, right? [1:31](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=91) It's all governmental hackers, basically, right? [1:35](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=95) People like John Kerry, who I guess can barely take a, a proper physics class, who keep claiming that greenhouse effect is so simple, right? [1:44](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=104) And then, uh, he refused to explain how does it work. [1:47](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=107) One of the primary sad thing that they refuse to recognize that I know you know that in, in even grade school, uh, sciences, CO2 is the gas of life. [1:57](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=117) It-- when you have more CO2, the plant kingdom, the whole ecology, even the oceans gonna have more basically ability, more fishes, more everything. [2:08](https://www.translate.mom/transcript/ntzGtTeitzrT/en/astrophysicist-disputes-co2-s-climate-impact-and-criticizes-the-ipcc?t=128) More life. More life, essentially. That's why it's called gas of life, and these people want to demonize it as some gas that can-