Canadian Federal Election 2025

Table of Contents

Canadian Federal Election 2025: Winners, Losers, and Polls in the Leaders’ Debates

The 2025 Canadian federal election, set for April 28, has reached a critical juncture with the French and English leaders’ debates held on April 16 and 17 in Montreal. These debates, featuring Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, were pivotal moments in a campaign dominated by economic concerns, U.S. trade threats, and domestic issues like affordability. With polls showing a tight race, the debates offered a chance for leaders to sway undecided voters and shift momentum. Here’s a breakdown of the winners, losers, and what the polls reveal about the debates’ impact.

Winners of the 2025 Leaders’ Debates

Pierre Poilievre (Conservative Party)Poilievre emerged as a strong contender, particularly in the English debate, where his sharp rhetoric and focus on domestic issues resonated with viewers. He hammered Carney on the Liberals’ record, tying him to Justin Trudeau’s unpopular policies on inflation, immigration, and crime. Poilievre’s emotional closing statement, where he spoke about Canadians’ struggles, softened his often-aggressive image and showcased a more relatable side. According to a snap poll by Abacus Data, 43% of viewers felt Poilievre did the most to earn their vote, narrowly edging out Carney at 40%. Posts on X echoed this sentiment, with some users declaring Poilievre the clear winner for his commanding presence.

In the French debate, Poilievre’s fluency and ability to challenge Carney’s weaker French performance gave him an edge. Pre-debate polls had 34% of Canadians expecting him to win the French debate, compared to 16% for Carney. His focus on economic resilience and criticism of Liberal policies played well, especially among Conservative-leaning voters in Quebec and the Prairies.

Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc Québécois)Blanchet was a standout, particularly in the French debate, where his native fluency and sharp wit allowed him to defend Quebec’s interests effectively. In the English debate, he delivered memorable lines, such as his retort to Singh about NDP support for Liberal subsidies: “You voted for it.” His reasonable and articulate defense of Quebec’s identity and sovereignty bolstered his party’s position in the province, where polls show the Bloc holding steady at 23%. Analysts noted Blanchet’s ability to challenge Carney without alienating Quebec voters, many of whom are leaning Liberal but could swing back to the Bloc.

Losers of the 2025 Leaders’ Debates

Mark Carney (Liberal Party)As the frontrunner, Carney faced intense scrutiny and was targeted by all three opponents. While he held his own in the English debate, earning a net positive impression of +37 compared to Poilievre’s +23, his performance was not a knockout. Carney leaned heavily on his credentials as a former central banker to address the U.S. trade war sparked by Donald Trump’s tariffs, but his responses lacked the emotional punch needed to solidify his lead. His gaffe in the English debate, confusing Keystone XL with the Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline, drew criticism and highlighted his political inexperience.

The French debate was Carney’s weaker showing, as his limited fluency made it harder to counter rapid-fire attacks from Poilievre and Blanchet. Despite pre-debate polls favoring him for the English debate (41% expected him to win), only 16% thought he’d excel in French, and he struggled to connect with Quebec voters. While Carney’s Liberals maintain a lead in polls, his debate performances didn’t widen the gap, leaving room for Poilievre to close in.

Jagmeet Singh (NDP)Singh was the debates’ clearest loser. His frequent interruptions in the English debate came across as disruptive, earning him a net impression of just +6 in the Abacus snap poll, far behind Carney and Poilievre. Only 11% of viewers felt he did the most to earn their vote, and 35% reported a negative impression of his performance. Posts on X described Singh as a “nuisance” whose demeanor hurt his credibility. In the French debate, Singh’s comfort in the language didn’t translate into memorable moments, and his focus on social programs failed to differentiate him in a race dominated by economic and sovereignty concerns. With the NDP polling at a dismal 5% nationally, Singh’s performance likely deepened the party’s slide.

Insights from the Polls

The debates occurred against a backdrop of a tightening race. Here’s what the latest polls reveal:

• National Race
• : An Abacus Data poll conducted April 14-15 showed the Liberals leading at 40%, with the Conservatives at 38%, a narrowing from a six-point Liberal lead earlier in April. Among certain voters, the Conservatives edge out the Liberals 40% to 39%, suggesting a potential turnout advantage for Poilievre. A Liaison Strategies poll on April 17 gave the Liberals a stronger 46% to 39% lead, but the NDP’s drop to 5% signals a collapse of left-leaning support, much of which is consolidating around Carney.

• Regional Dynamics
• : The Liberals dominate in Atlantic Canada, Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia, with 51% support in Ontario and B.C. The Conservatives lead in the Prairies and Alberta, while Quebec remains a three-way contest among the Liberals, Conservatives, and Bloc Québécois. Carney’s popularity in Quebec, despite his French-language struggles, is bolstered by a wave of patriotism sparked by Trump’s trade threats.

• Debate Expectations and Impact
• : Pre-debate polls indicated Carney was favored to win the English debate (41% vs. 29% for Poilievre), while Poilievre was expected to shine in French (34% vs. 16% for Carney). Post-debate, the Abacus snap poll suggested a draw, with neither Carney nor Poilievre gaining a significant edge. However, 59% of viewers felt more positive about Carney compared to 53% for Poilievre, indicating Carney maintained his frontrunner status without losing ground.

• Voter Sentiment
• : Trump’s tariffs and annexation threats have unified Canadians, boosting Carney’s Liberals, who are seen as better equipped to handle U.S. relations. A Nanos poll showed a majority prefer Carney over Poilievre for Trump negotiations. However, Poilievre’s strength on domestic issues like cost of living and crime resonates with voters, particularly men aged 35-54, where Conservatives lead.

• Gender Gap
• : Polls highlight a stark gender divide. The Liberals lead by 19 points among women, while the Conservatives have a two-point edge among men. This gap could influence turnout, as Conservative supporters appear more mobilized.

Analysis and Outlook

The debates didn’t deliver a game-changing moment, but they clarified the race’s dynamics. Poilievre’s strong showing keeps the Conservatives competitive, especially if their turnout advantage holds. His ability to blend policy critiques with emotional appeals could sway undecided voters, particularly in Conservative strongholds. Blanchet’s performance strengthens the Bloc’s position in Quebec, potentially splitting the vote and complicating paths to a majority government.

Carney, despite not dominating, avoided major missteps in the English debate and remains the frontrunner. His lead is fueled by patriotism and perceptions of competence in handling Trump, but his French debate struggles and policy gaffes expose vulnerabilities. Singh’s poor performance likely seals the NDP’s fate as a marginal player, with their voters drifting to the Liberals.

Polls suggest the Liberals are on track for a minority or slim majority, but the race remains volatile. With advance polling open from April 18-21 and Election Day looming, post-debate narratives—shaped by media, social media, and voter discussions over the Easter weekend—could shift momentum. Poilievre’s rally crowds signal enthusiasm, but Carney’s broader demographic appeal, especially among women and in urban centers, gives the Liberals an edge.

The debates underscored a campaign defined by external pressures (Trump) and internal divides (affordability, sovereignty). While no leader landed a knockout blow, Poilievre and Blanchet gained ground, Carney held steady, and Singh faltered. The next polls will reveal whether these performances move the needle in a race that’s too close to call.

Disclaimer: Polls reflect snapshots of public opinion and are subject to change. Voter turnout and regional swings will ultimately decide the outcome on April 28.

Dub, translate and caption any video/audio using https://translate.mom