1994 Israeli Embassy Bombing: Claims of a Mossad False Flag
Uh, but the two cases that really got us, first of all, there was a, a false flag
a-attack in London in 1994,
where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli Embassy in the center of
London.
Now, I remember this vaguely.
Mm.
This is... We're talking 14 years ago.
It's a long time ago, yeah.
But it was huge at the time. I mean, it was a huge worldwide story.
Yeah, yeah. In fact, there'd been, um, an earlier attack against some Jewish
interests, uh, section in Buenos Aires earlier
that year as well.
Similar sort of MO, um, modus operandi, with a car bomb driven and parked
outside that exploded. Very minor injuries. That was all.
Okay.
Nobody was killed. And, um, it was a very sophisticated device.
It appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics. Now, this is very,
very rare.
Even the IRA, which is a very sophisticated terrorist
organization, could not make
bombs that, um, effective.
Um, so it looked like a, you know, sort of fairly technical person had put
that
together.
But what emerged from that, um, the senior MI5 officer who was in
charge of the investigation into it, um, and had seen all the evidence, but also
all the intelligence, which isn't necessarily admissible in
court, wrote his formal
assessment at the end of the case, and he said he reckoned that Mossad,
the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their own embassy,
a sort of extr- uh, controlled explosion outside the embassy.
And as I said, that was a senior MI5 officer, and that
was his formal verdict.
If you read that on the internet now, you would say, "That sounds like some mad
conspiracy theory." But it wasn't.
This was the official position of MI5.
And he said that they did it for two reasons.
One, they were always hassling MI5 for
increased security around their
embassy and other interests in London because, of course, London had
a, a reputation of giving safe haven to Arab
dissidents from around the world at
that point.
And MI5 kept saying, "Well, there's no reason to increase the threat
assessment.
You don't need extra protection." So letting off a controlled explosion
outside, of
course, they immediately got what they wanted
there.
But crucially, two innocent Palestinians were arrested,
charged, and convicted of conspiracy to cause
that attack.
And
they were very active in a Palestinian support network in London, political
campaigning for the people on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and they were
gaining some traction in the media. They were getting quite a lot of support.
So by arresting these people and framing them for an attack,
and sticking them in
prison, the whole network just shattered
and hasn't got back on its feet to this
day. So that would be a clear political
advantage
End of transcript · 478 words