Analysis of Alleged Military Operation in Yemen

A story about an airborne operation. A

commando unit landed inside Sana'a.

They eliminated a commander or took commanders, claiming, "We took them."

and left Sana'a. Is this account even logical? I mean,

This entire account makes no sense, and no

sane person could accept it under the current circumstances.

I mean, Uncle Ayman, the first question is, if we say it was a landing operation, how is it done?

Don't tell me, with F-15s or F-35s,

or a jumbo jet or cargo plane. For any landing operation,

helicopters are used. And the question now is,

how can F-15s strike

and strike in Ma'rib? You've seen them shooting down MQ-9 aircraft,

which are reconnaissance planes, meaning they make no sound

and have a weak radar signature. They're spy planes, the enemy isn't supposed to

see them, yet they get shot down. How could a helicopter

get in? Helicopters

got in and took people or eliminated people, and no one detected them, knowing that they

fly low or at a low altitude.

Their sound is loud, and their radar signature is large.

This is the first thing that shows you the story here does not hold up.

Second, the problem is not with the insertion operation.

The problem is with the evacuation operation itself. Let's assume it happened.

Come on.

The helicopters camouflaged themselves to avoid detection, then landed, and landed.

Commandos parachuted down.

Aside from the question of how they were not spotted and how they were not shot at in

the air. A parachute insertion operation over a city

considered a security stronghold, in the heart of it. Everyone

hits the ground. But let's assume it happened.

How were they evacuated?

I mean, where did the helicopter that got them out land?

Especially since the evacuation operation is more dangerous than the insertion operation.

Why? Because

after the insertion, your enemy knows their opponent. They know there is an insertion, a search, or

an attack, or God knows how you get back safely. Let's assume you are the helicopter.

Therefore,

this information also shows you that this story does not hold up. Third, and most importantly.

The American insertion operation in Iran.

You saw it. And this is America. I'm not talking now about Yemeni forces from

any side. I don't think there is any side in Yemen that has

The capability to carry out

such an operation, to land in the heart of the main city

for the other side by helicopter and deploy commandos to take people from the middle of

neighborhoods and leave.

Let alone two operations at the same time. There is no video documenting

this. So forget the airborne landing operation.

This airborne landing operation was invented by two people.

It was invented by an adviser to the Presidential Council in Aden.

With all due respect, Your Excellency Adviser, focus before you write. Secondly.

Yemeni social media. But Arab accounts and Saudi sources speak

of

one operation. Saudi Okaz speaks of two operations in Naqm. And.