Transcript · English → Chinese
English → Chinese transcript
病毒学是一门伪科学， 而他们声称会导致疾病的病毒
从未被真正证实存在过。
这一切都始于细菌学说。 当路易·巴斯德和罗伯特·
科赫无法为每种疾病找到细菌时， 他们并没有质疑自己的
理论。他们发明了一个替罪羊，一个
隐形的、 比细菌还小的可过滤病原体。
病毒并非被发现的。它 是一个为了挽救失败的
假说而创造出来的概念。
从一开始，它的存在 就是被推断出来的，而非被证实的。
当病毒学家说他们分离出了 一种病毒时，你可能会
想象他们从病人身上采集样本， 并分离出纯净的病毒
颗粒。但这从未发生过。
一次也没有。
以下是他们实际上的做法。 他们从病人身上提取
未经净化的液体，混合了黏液、细菌、 人类
细胞，谁知道还有什么。
他们不进行清理。
相反， 他们把这些脏东西和有毒的抗生素 混合，
动物
血清， 然后将其倾倒在细胞培养物上，
通常来自
猴子肾脏或流产的人类胎儿。
他们让这些细胞饥饿并对其下毒数 天， 直到它们开始分解
并死亡。
他们将这种细胞死亡称为细胞病变 效应，并声称
这就是病毒正在杀死细胞的证据。
由此产生的死细胞和化学物质的 有毒混合汤，就是他们所谓的
病毒分离物。
他们从未证明样本中 一开始就存在病毒。
他们只是这样假设， 然后用他们造成的细胞死亡
来作为证据。
这完全是循环论证。
但是电子显微镜下的 照片又是怎么回事？
那些著名的带刺小球？
他们取一滴同样那样的有毒混合汤， 将其置于
毁灭性的化学过程 杀死并扭曲了一切，
然后在显微镜下 观察这些碎片。
他们指向一个随机微粒，它 与正常的
细胞碎片或外泌体无异，并宣称：
“那就是病毒。”
没有经过纯化， 无法证明它来自人体，
也无法证明它
具有致病性。
这不过是指着一个点 编故事罢了。
至于病毒基因组，
它们是在电脑上创建出来的。
他们从那未经纯化的细胞培养 获取所有随机基因片段
液——人类DNA、猴子DNA、细菌
DNA——并使用软件拼接出一段 他们认为
看起来像病毒的序列。
这个数字化模型 随后被称为参考基因组。
它并非来自真实的纯化病毒，
而是电脑模拟的产物。
这就是为什么像 SARS-CoV-2 这样的病毒 会有数百万种变异株。
他们只是在微调计算机模型。
它是一个数字幻影， 而非生物学现实。
End of transcript · 470 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Virology is a pseudoscience, and the viruses they claim cause disease have never actually been proven to exist. It all started with germ theory. When Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch couldn't find a bacteria for every disease, they didn't question their theory. They invented a scapegoat, an
invisible, filterable agent smaller than bacteria. The virus wasn't discovered. It was a concept created to save a failing hypothesis. From the very beginning, its existence was inferred, not proven. When virologists say they isolated a virus, you probably
picture them taking a sample from a sick person and separating a pure virus particle. That has never happened. Not once. Here's what they actually do. They take unpurified fluid from a sick person, a mix of mucus, bacteria, human
cells, and who knows what else. They don't clean it. Instead, they mix this gunk with toxic antibiotics, animal serum, and then dump it onto a culture of cells,
usually from monkey kidneys or aborted human fetuses. They starve and poison these cells for days until they start to break down and die. They call this cell death the cytopathic effect, and they claim
it's proof a virus is killing the cells. The resulting toxic soup of dead cells and chemicals is what they call a virus isolate. They never prove a virus was in the sample to begin with. They just assume it and then use the cell death they created
as proof. It's completely circular reasoning. But what about the pictures from the electron microscope? Those famous spiky balls? They take a drop of that same toxic soup, subject it to a
destructive chemical process that kills and distorts everything, and then look at the debris under a microscope. They point to a random particle, which is indistinguishable from normal cellular debris or exosomes, and declare, "That's the virus."
No purification, no proof it came from a person, no proof it's pathogenic. It's just pointing at a dot and telling a story. And the viral genomes,
they're created on a computer. They take all the random genetic fragments from that unpurified cell culture soup—human DNA, monkey DNA, bacterial DNA—and use software to stitch together a sequence they think looks like a virus.
This digital model is then called the reference genome. It's not from a real purified virus. It's an in silico creation. That's why there are millions of variants for something like SARS-CoV-2. They're just tweaking the computer model.
It's a digital phantom, not a biological reality.
