Analysis of World Cup Referee Decisions

The referee, this is the same referee when we were leading 2-0 until the 80th minute.

The first goal that Ziko scored, yes, in the buildup stages...

of the attack, or what is called APP, there was a foul committed by Marwan Attia

against the Argentine striker, and referring to VAR in this case,

the referee was right. Yes, but honestly, I am discussing the truth with you,

because, yes, we are following the World Cup. There are challenges, indeed, that referees...

It is very clear that they have instructions to let some challenges pass. So, is

this among the challenges that can be allowed? Surely it is. Let's talk

about a case like this. Yes, as long as VAR summoned the referee and showed him a picture

and showed him the stamping. Yes, the referee cannot go back and say, 'I saw

the stamping but I won't call it.' Yes, meaning VAR... I mean, was it a stamp or just stepping on

the foot, Captain? No, there was stamping. Yes, but just to link this case

with Captain Mohamed Salah's case. Yes, go ahead, Captain, what exactly?

Ah, here, at the moment of the stamp, the ball was in the possession of the Argentine attacker. Yes.

And therefore, he still had the ball, and it was still in his possession. Now, let's go back to the ball

of Mohamed Salah that came after it, and why, when he scored the third goal from it,

the referee didn't go back to VAR. Because the Argentine defender inside

the 18-yard box was able to win the ball from Captain Mohamed Salah,

and the ball went behind him. What happened after that was a natural contact that does not warrant

a VAR review. Yes. Yes. What? It's just from the shock, we keep saying...

Well, here it's suicide.