Analysis of Hezbollah's Role in Syria

The first weeks, the first weeks may be the first time it is discussed

in the media.

It was in Iran, in His Eminence the Leader's operations room.

He was personally interested in the matter.

And so were all the institutions in Iran.

This time, without leaks, sources, or hearsay.

The gist of the Lebanese Hezbollah militia leader's speech: We abandoned the Syrian people, so what are you going to do?

Syrian people, so what are you going to do?

There are only two options.

Either you surrender and are crushed,

along with Syria and all the fronts.

Our choice was clear. We had no choice

but the choice of struggle.

A sectarian frank discussion, according to some, lasted about

four hours, during which Hassan Nasrallah said:

We entered the fray in a certain way. The Iranian brothers entered the fray.

The Iraqi brothers and other forces later, the Fatemiyoun

and Zainabiyoun, so that everyone gets their due, I mean.

The above are words and dots spoken by the criminal Nasrallah without

taqiyya or shame. It remains for Syrians to write the same

sign and add its dots, then feed it to their children in

the camps. And the remaining millions are still amid the rubble of

cities and towns, defined by the name, appearance, and religion

and hatred of their enemy. And to begin arranging what Islamic law

and even the laws guarantee for vengeance, retaliation, liberation or

reciprocal treatment, or whatever it may be called, for the blood of

two million Syrians is not cheap, and their land is not common property and the days

are changeable, as they say, and we are the ones who began.

Because we are in a huge, great,

dangerous, historic conflict.

The day after the announcement of the victory

of the Egyptian Revolution and the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak.

The next day, Haj Qassem Soleimani was here in Dahieh, under the pretext of

the Arab Spring, the problems, and the slogans that

were raised in Tunisia and Egypt.

Nasrallah himself says that what happened in Syria was an extension

of the Arab Spring revolutions, as happened in Egypt.

And the basic idea at that time was, I mean, among

Assad's leadership

and us, Haj Qassem, the Brotherhood, and the brethren in Iran.

They wanted to start a movement of demands, but behind them stood

countries, governments, axes, and organized forces.

To psychologically justify his crimes and analyze the bloodshed of the Syrian majority

In that same interview and moment, he says it was

a global war.

Therefore, no one exaggerates when they say the global war against Syria

was a global war.

Lebanon's and Iraq's Shiites, along with Nasrallah, know that the Assad regime

surpasses the regimes whose peoples rose up to overthrow them

by being a corrupt, minority dictatorship and, on top of that,

hereditary.

His Eminence the Leader was in an operations room in Iran.

He was personally invested in the matter. The day after the announcement

of the Egyptian Revolution's victory.

Nasrallah's testimony points to premeditated sectarian hatred

against the people of the land, as expressed by the criminal Qassem Soleimani's concern

about the revolution reaching Syria.

Haj Qassem would say, "I am happy for the Egyptian people,

but I am worried." He said, "I feel that, under the pretext of

the Arab Spring, and the issues and slogans that

were raised in Tunisia, Egypt, and elsewhere,

they will target the regimes, states, and governments

supporting the resistance.

What are you murderers worried about when you know that what happened

was a natural popular movement in the course of life to correct it

since the beginning of creation?

Was the criminal Soleimani, thousands of kilometers away, worried about the desire

of Syrians to govern themselves under a

democratic, pluralistic, rights-based system?

Or were you worried about the achievements of your Shiite Persian axis

turning Syria's historic cities and urban centers into heaps of rubble?

Or about what you treated Syrians to, scenes of your backwardness

culturally, morally, and religiously, through killing, displacement,

and the homelessness of millions?

Hajj Qassem Soleimani went to Moscow and met

with President Putin for two hours, and he says at the table, "I

laid out the maps, the current reality.

Where are we?" He gave him a strategic assessment of the situation

in Syria and the surrounding region. In that meeting,

President Putin said to Hajj, "I am convinced."

Nasrallah then goes on in his long speech to affirm Iran's role

and the criminal Soleimani's role in convincing Vladimir Putin to come to

Syria and take part in killing and displacing Syrians.

Yes, the caliphate.

We entered the fray.

Frankly, to avoid dragging this out and out of respect for the Syrians' wishes

and feelings, not to hear or see the criminal Nasrallah

and his beard. Syrians must spell out

the names of their killers clearly and candidly,

and those who killed their faith, groups and individuals. Whoever feels no shame before you

or your blood and honor, treat him as he treated you. Let

ruin and destruction befall everyone, whether it is Bashar's minority

and his militias, who killed and displaced people, or Iran's rabble, Nasrallah

the Afghans, the Pakistanis, and even Iraq, which sent

dozens of militias, whose turbaned clerics said outright that they were

prepared to send the entire Iraqi army to fight the Syrian people.

These are the words of the criminal Nour

al-Maliki.

As for Hajj Qassem Soleimani's position, along with

the mujahideen who stood in Syria, defended, resisted,

and all of us stood, I say this without fear or trepidation.

We stood and said that if we saw the possibility of the fall of the

Syrian regime, we would take the Iraqi army and fight in Syria.