Analysis of Recent Military Statements

I wanted to ask a question.

You know that in one of the recent statements of the IRGC,

there was actually a clause or a paragraph

that led to some interpretations.

I will read that sentence, and then

I will also tell you about the interpretations that were made.

I think it is statement number 46 of the IRGC, which says that

we will not allow America, with deceptive ceasefires,

to replenish its oil and ammunition reserves

and then resume its attacks.

Some have interpreted this as

the IRGC, with this clause in its statement, wants to imply that

in the agreement that was signed, we were somehow

deceived, and an opportunity was created for

the Americans to go and reinforce themselves and return with updated capabilities.

Of course, many also believe that

I think there were also hints in your remarks

that this time also created an opportunity for us to

be able to redefine, revive, and strengthen our capabilities.

Is the interpretation that we were deceived in that agreement and this agreement

was actually imposed on our armed forces correct or not?

It is addressed to America. It is addressed to the enemy. It is not addressed domestically.

The fact that we stated in these declarations that, in fact,

with a ceasefire, for example, we won't be deceived again and so on.

This is addressed to them, saying that you are deceitful

and you have deceived us before, and we won't allow this path anymore.

But it doesn't mean that we were deceived in this ceasefire and this agreement.

This is addressed to America. It is addressed to the enemy.

Our people at home should know, and of course they do.

Those who actually have the necessary and sufficient insight,

the general public, thank God, are like this, they know that we were not deceived domestically.

First of all, this decision for a ceasefire and the decision

to actually conclude the agreement is the system's decision.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is also part of the system.

When the system has reached a decision, surely the IRGC also, in relation to...

The establishment will submit to that decision and has indeed submitted.

Secondly, we actually weren't deceived here at all.

From the very beginning, we said we don't trust the enemy,

our enemy is deceitful, and our finger is on the trigger, and

whenever necessary, we will return to our original state.

The third point is that we actually benefited during this period.

Contrary to what is being said, America did not benefit from this.

If you look at America's oil reserves before this

ceasefire and before this agreement, and see how much it was,

and how much it was at the end of this ceasefire and how much it decreased, you will conclude that

America was unable to take advantage of this opportunity.

It couldn't even replace its oil deficit.

Its oil deficit has increased. It wasn't compensated. Not even a small percentage was compensated. It became less

than that level. Therefore, for anyone to propagate that

Sir, America took advantage of this opportunity and, let me tell you...

deceived us to take advantage of it, it's not like that.

They should look at the statistics, it's not like that.

To say, for example, that America would take advantage of this opportunity...

to come and reload its magazines and bring equipment, that's not the case either.

Because America, during this 40-day war, was constantly bringing equipment.

There was no obstacle to America bringing equipment.

They were bringing it from over there, using airports of different countries,

and no one was stopping them to deprive them of the opportunity so that...

they couldn't bring it; they were constantly bringing it.

Therefore, America did not take advantage of this opportunity in the way that is being said.

But we took advantage of this opportunity and increased our capability.

We increased the production speed of our missiles, improved their accuracy, and enhanced our military readiness.

We strengthened our passive defense.

And it was us who made the best use of this opportunity

Those who publish some of this content probably have...

...limited information.

They should hear from sources that possess the information.

As I said, they should go and see how much the US has taken advantage of this opportunity.

Just look at the US oil reserves, which are very important to them, see how much they could replace.

But we might not be able to say right now, due to specific security conditions, what...

...military achievements we have made, but it is evident in our power.

It is evident in practice that we are striking, and striking well, just as I said, the network...

What? Are you destroying the US power?