Dr. Buttar on WHO, Physician Confidence, Vaccines, Autism and DDT

We have

undercover footage of the World Health Organization in their

private forum talking about how the

confidence level among the physician community worldwide

is decreasing.

The WHO is trying to decide on a strategy, a marketing

campaign. When you have to have a marketing strategy

to convince the health

professionals, those who have been appointed to,

to safeguard our health and the

chil- our children's health, you know that there's something that doesn't smell

right.

The Centers for Disease Control's own data shows that one percent of the u- of

the population of the planet currently has autism.

The current world's population is seven point seven billion.

One percent of that is seventy-seven million.

According to the CDC's own data, m- seventy-seven

million children and young adults have autism on our planet

right now. In twenty-nine years, to go from one in ten thousand to one

in thirty,

there's something wrong.

Look at polio, and then look at the incidence of DDT.

Now, most

chemical compounds that have been introduced into the global

economy, it takes...

Of the, of the dirty dozen, the twelve most toxic substances that

are banned

across every nation on the planet, those twelve, before they

became banned, had been used in global commerce for a

minimum of fifty years,

most of them for over seventy years, before it was determined how dangerous

they

were. Now, back then, during the smallpox, uh, pox era,

there was a chemical called DDT, and DDT is today considered one of those

dirty dozen. Nobody uses it. It's considered toxic,

and it's considered banned from

all nations. But there were ads in the United States with

children

saying, "Flies don't land on me because I've had

my

DDT." So when people say, uh, "What's that got to do with

polio?" The incidence of polio, if you graph it, and the incidence of the

use of DDT, polio was six months behind the incidence of

DDT.

So when you would see DDT levels peaking, you would see polio peak

six months later. Then you'd see DDT, uh, usage dropping, you'd see

polio six months later drop. This is a very interesting observation.

I don't know whether that means that DDT was causing it, but certainly,

smallpox vaccine was not the reason that smallpox was eradicated.

I believe it was because we stopped using DDT.

So this, this is a political thing, but when it comes down to the

aspect of vaccinations, people say, "Dr.

Buttar, you're an anti-vaxxer." I'm not

anti-vaccine, because if

there was a vaccine that didn't have all those preservatives

in there that are

highly toxic, like mercury and formaldehyde and nickel,

and didn't have the DNA

adducts that are, that are added to increase a,

uh, reaction, uh, if they didn't have various human cell

lines, mutated

human cell lines, DNA from other species like dogs

and monkeys with

other viral loads in there. If they didn't have all those things in

there, and they

actually were given at a time when a child could seroconvert,

because we give these

vaccines on the first day of the planet, yet a child's immune

system can't even seroconvert, can't even mount an immune response till

six months

to a year of age. So now we've got all these components,

and then using

things like mercury, the body can't even eliminate it till the

alimentary system is

fully developed, which takes about a year for the,

for the alimentary tract to

develop. But if they made a vaccine that didn't have DNA adducts, didn't have

mutated human cell lines, didn't have adjuvants,

didn't have mercury, nickel,

formaldehyde, and other contaminants and other things that are dangerous, that

suppress the immune system, didn't have glyphosate,

which now they have glyphosate

in there, they have Roundup, the weed killer in vaccines.

If they didn't have all that stuff in there,

and it would actually given at a time

when a child could actually seroconvert, like at a year, a year and a half of age,

and it didn't cause any harm, I would be all for it.

I would be totally for it.

We have over seventy-four hundred doctors that have reached out over the last

month, so we weren't able to get everybody on

here, and, you know, people

are busy and scheduled. So I believe that there's thousands and

thousands of doctors worldwide that feel this way.

They're just not being represented because the media is

definitely trying to prevent this information from getting out.

There's a lot of people that feel this and understand this, so it's just...

it's one of those m- one of those incredible

moments when s- we start realizing that we are the vast

majority, but because we've been singled out,

because we're not being...

because we're not getting a voice or a fair voice, it is being

prevented. The information is being prevented from being disseminated

to the world

so that the question can be asked, "Why is this happening?"

Censorship is always something that an

authoritarian dictatorship-type government would want to, when they want

to prevent the dissemination of information.

So rather than even trying to give a reason for the censorship, let's

ask the millions of people out there that may be seeing this,

why would anybody censor

facts and truth about injury that's been caused by

something that has been promoted for the last twenty or thirty years

as the s- as the single most important safety

component for our children, yet has caused more injuries,

more documented

injuries, m- you know, millions of children being maimed

worldwide.

Why would you want to stop the conversation?

In the nineteen eighties,

the vaccine industry came to Congress and said, "We

need help." The vaccine industry came in the nineteen

eighties and asked for a bailout.

President Reagan at the time said, "This is not a good idea,"

but Congress went

ahead and bailed them out.

And the reason that they, the reason that they gave was,

"We have so many lawsuits,

we cannot make vaccines. We cannot afford to be in business." So

the

government bailed them out, and the government then took over the

oversight

with a mandate that every two years they would do safety studies on different

vaccines. Up to this point, two thousand twenty,

now we're talking about forty,

fifty years later, s- because this was like in the seventies

and the eighties.

Let's just say in the last forty years.

Guess how many safety studies have been done by the US government to assess the

efficacy and safety of vaccines?

I'll, I'll save you some time. Zero.

So the, the mandate that the government took over to do

oversight has

been, has been totally ignored. Now, and it's not that they did it

on purpose. I think they just, like the government,

they dropped the ball.

Now, let's say that I file a lawsuit against a

vaccine

manufacturer. Guess who the defendant is on

that lawsuit when it's filed with the government?

The defendant is not that vaccine manufacturer.

It's HHS. It's the Health and Human Services.

It's the US government that you're suing because of a vaccine

injury.

And guess who's defending the US government? The Department of Justice.

So you, when you have a child that's been injured,

you're fighting the Department

of Justice. You're fighting the US government.

And remember, the Department of Justice is supposed to be making sure that justice

is being done. Instead, they are fighting to defend the Health

and Human

Services from somebody who's been injured.

Now, does that make any sense whatsoever?