WHO's Strategy on Physician Confidence

We have undercover footage of the World Health Organization in their private forum talking about how the confidence level among the physician community worldwide is decreasing.

The WHO is trying to decide on a strategy, a marketing campaign. When you have to have a marketing strategy to convince the health professionals, those who have been appointed to, to safeguard our health and the

chil- our children's health, you know that there's something that doesn't smell right. The Centers for Disease Control's own data shows that one percent of the u- of the population of the planet currently has autism. The current world's population is seven point seven billion.

One percent of that is seventy-seven million. According to the CDC's own data, m- seventy-seven million children and young adults have autism on our planet right now. In twenty-nine years, to go from one in ten thousand to one in thirty,

there's something wrong. Look at polio, and then look at the incidence of DDT. Now, most chemical compounds that have been introduced into the global economy, it takes...

Of the, of the dirty dozen, the twelve most toxic substances that are banned across every nation on the planet, those twelve, before they became banned, had been used in global commerce for a minimum of fifty years,

most of them for over seventy years, before it was determined how dangerous they were. Now, back then, during the smallpox, uh, pox era, there was a chemical called DDT, and DDT is today considered one of those dirty dozen. Nobody uses it. It's considered toxic,

and it's considered banned from all nations. But there were ads in the United States with children saying, "Flies don't land on me because I've had my

DDT." So when people say, uh, "What's that got to do with polio?" The incidence of polio, if you graph it, and the incidence of the use of DDT, polio was six months behind the incidence of DDT. So when you would see DDT levels peaking, you would see polio peak

six months later. Then you'd see DDT, uh, usage dropping, you'd see polio six months later drop. This is a very interesting observation. I don't know whether that means that DDT was causing it, but certainly, smallpox vaccine was not the reason that smallpox was eradicated. I believe it was because we stopped using DDT.

So this, this is a political thing, but when it comes down to the aspect of vaccinations, people say, "Dr. Buttar, you're an anti-vaxxer." I'm not anti-vaccine, because if there was a vaccine that didn't have all those preservatives

in there that are highly toxic, like mercury and formaldehyde and nickel, and didn't have the DNA adducts that are, that are added to increase a, uh, reaction, uh, if they didn't have various human cell

lines, mutated human cell lines, DNA from other species like dogs and monkeys with other viral loads in there. If they didn't have all those things in there, and they

actually were given at a time when a child could seroconvert, because we give these vaccines on the first day of the planet, yet a child's immune system can't even seroconvert, can't even mount an immune response till six months

to a year of age. So now we've got all these components, and then using things like mercury, the body can't even eliminate it till the alimentary system is fully developed, which takes about a year for the,

for the alimentary tract to develop. But if they made a vaccine that didn't have DNA adducts, didn't have mutated human cell lines, didn't have adjuvants, didn't have mercury, nickel, formaldehyde, and other contaminants and other things that are dangerous, that

suppress the immune system, didn't have glyphosate, which now they have glyphosate in there, they have Roundup, the weed killer in vaccines. If they didn't have all that stuff in there, and it would actually given at a time

when a child could actually seroconvert, like at a year, a year and a half of age, and it didn't cause any harm, I would be all for it. I would be totally for it. We have over seventy-four hundred doctors that have reached out over the last month, so we weren't able to get everybody on

here, and, you know, people are busy and scheduled. So I believe that there's thousands and thousands of doctors worldwide that feel this way. They're just not being represented because the media is definitely trying to prevent this information from getting out.

There's a lot of people that feel this and understand this, so it's just... it's one of those m- one of those incredible moments when s- we start realizing that we are the vast majority, but because we've been singled out, because we're not being...

because we're not getting a voice or a fair voice, it is being prevented. The information is being prevented from being disseminated to the world so that the question can be asked, "Why is this happening?" Censorship is always something that an

authoritarian dictatorship-type government would want to, when they want to prevent the dissemination of information. So rather than even trying to give a reason for the censorship, let's ask the millions of people out there that may be seeing this, why would anybody censor

facts and truth about injury that's been caused by something that has been promoted for the last twenty or thirty years as the s- as the single most important safety component for our children, yet has caused more injuries, more documented

injuries, m- you know, millions of children being maimed worldwide. Why would you want to stop the conversation? In the nineteen eighties, the vaccine industry came to Congress and said, "We

need help." The vaccine industry came in the nineteen eighties and asked for a bailout. President Reagan at the time said, "This is not a good idea," but Congress went ahead and bailed them out.

And the reason that they, the reason that they gave was, "We have so many lawsuits, we cannot make vaccines. We cannot afford to be in business." So the government bailed them out, and the government then took over the

oversight with a mandate that every two years they would do safety studies on different vaccines. Up to this point, two thousand twenty, now we're talking about forty, fifty years later, s- because this was like in the seventies

and the eighties. Let's just say in the last forty years. Guess how many safety studies have been done by the US government to assess the efficacy and safety of vaccines? I'll, I'll save you some time. Zero.

So the, the mandate that the government took over to do oversight has been, has been totally ignored. Now, and it's not that they did it on purpose. I think they just, like the government, they dropped the ball.

Now, let's say that I file a lawsuit against a vaccine manufacturer. Guess who the defendant is on that lawsuit when it's filed with the government? The defendant is not that vaccine manufacturer.

It's HHS. It's the Health and Human Services. It's the US government that you're suing because of a vaccine injury. And guess who's defending the US government? The Department of Justice. So you, when you have a child that's been injured,

you're fighting the Department of Justice. You're fighting the US government. And remember, the Department of Justice is supposed to be making sure that justice is being done. Instead, they are fighting to defend the Health and Human

Services from somebody who's been injured. Now, does that make any sense whatsoever?