Transcript · English → Chinese
Critique of Marxism and Social Justice
把那个戴上，这样你就能听见了。
我要发表一场我以前从未发表过的 演讲。
我恨马克思主义，也恨共产主义。
是，先生。
我恨它，因为它在世界上每个 曾被尝试过的地方，都导致了
暴政、贫困、流亡， 以及压迫。
没错。
而且
人们曾犯过一个错误， 也许我们中有些人，也许我自己，曾 经
都犯过这个错误，那就是相信 马克思主义不知怎么已经消亡了，
马克思主义如今只是 大学教师俱乐部里的疯子们会在
某所
大学里谈论的话题， 但它其实已不再活跃。
我们犯的另一个错误是， 认为马克思主义是某种经济
理论。
这两种说法都不是真的。
马克思主义没有消亡， 它也不是一种经济理论。
发生的情况是， 马克思主义者意识到其过往的
记录
马克思主义遍布世界各地， 所以他们不想再自称
马克思主义者了。
他们找到了新的称号，
说实话，听起来很无害， 你几乎会觉得反对它们很内疚，
社会
公正。 谁会反对社会公正？
但他们想出的术语是 公平。
公平，谁会反对公平？
但事实是，这，而且， 而且，而且，这不只是关乎经济
问题。旧马克思主义 认为资本主义
体制，整个体制，
都有缺陷且被操纵， 还把人们分化。
它把—它说，世界、社会， 以及资本主义社会
被分为
两个群体。一群人 拥有企业，他们是
压迫者，另一群是工人， 其他所有人，那一群就是被
受害者。这就是共产主义的运作方式 。
它制造了一个受害者阶层， 也制造了一个压迫者阶层，
然后它说：“
解决这一切的唯一办法 就是我们必须推翻这个制度。
我们需要一场革命。 我们需要一个政府接管
并让一切变得公平， 我们需要一个政——
府去找那些曾经的
压迫者，要求他们为自己身为压迫者 道歉， 接受再教育
成为负责任的人，
并为他们所做的一切赎罪。” 这就是旧马克思主义，
而且听起来很熟悉，
因为如今我们被要求 去划分……
首先，有人告诉我们， 美国本身
就是建立在种族主义、偏见和邪—— 恶之上的。
不是说我们有种族主义 或偏见的历史，而是说我们建立在，
那就是，那就是 我们社会的根基，
就是我们
的历史已经无可救药地破碎了。
体制，这个体制被操纵了。
不是资本主义的问题，而是这个体制 被设定为
让压迫者获益，而非 受害者。谁是压迫者？
基本上，压迫者， 如果你听这些人怎么说，
就是任何一个
白人男性
异性恋者。
没错。
而其他所有人， 我想也包括我自己，
作为一名古巴裔美国人，
都是受害者，
唯一的答案
就是让政府出面，
创造公平，让一切变得公正。 现在，如果你以前不知道，现在你知 道了。
End of transcript · 510 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Put the thing on so you can hear this. I'm gonna give a speech I've never given before. I hate Marxism and I hate communism. Yes, sir. And I hate it because everywhere in the world it's ever been tried, it's led to
tyranny, and poverty, and exile, and oppression. That's right. And there's a mistake that people have made, maybe some of us, maybe myself, have been guilty of it, and that is the belief that somehow Marxism is dead,
that Marxism is now something that crazy people at the faculty club at some university talk about, but it isn't really alive anymore. The other mistake we make is that Marxism is some sort of economic theory.
Neither one of those things is true. Marxism is not dead, and it's not an economic theory. What's happened is that Marxists realize what the track record of Marxism is around the world, so they don't wanna call themselves
Marxists anymore. They have found new titles, things that frankly sound benign, and you almost feel guilty being against, social justice. Who can be against social justice?
But that's the terminology they come up with, equity. Equity, who can be against equity? But the truth of the matter is that, and, and, and that this is not about economics solely. The old Marxism was the argument that the capitalist system, the whole system,
was flawed and rigged, and it divided people. It ma- it said the world, and society, and capitalist societies are divided between two groups. You have one group which owns the businesses, they are the oppressors, and you have the workers, everybody else, that group are the
victims. And that's how communism works. It creates a victim class, it creates an oppressor class, and then it says, "The only way to fix this is we have to overthrow the system. We need a revolution. We need a government to take over
and make everything fair, and we need a government that s- goes to the former oppressors and makes them apologize for being an oppressors, be re-educated into responsible people, and pay a penance for what they've done." That's the old Marxism,
and it sounds familiar because today we are being asked to divide... First of all, we're being told that America in and of itself was founded on racism, prejudism, and e- prejudice and evil. Not that we have a history of racism or prejudice, but that we were founded on,
that that's the, that that's the foundation of our society, that we are irredeemably broken in our history. System, that the system is rigged. Not about capitalism, the system is set up
to benefit the oppressor versus the victim. And who's the oppressor? The oppressor, basically, if you listen to some of these people, is anyone who is a white male heterosexual.
That's right. And everybody else, I guess myself included, being a Cuban American, is a victim, and the only answer
is for government to step forward, and create equity, and make things fair. And now, if you don't know, now you know.
