Persian → English transcript

Regarding the principle that hostility with the United States as long as either side

remains as such is not resolvable, is clear. In the gray zone, the war hasn't

ended at all, and it won't ever end for it to return. I say it is there,

it is continuing. The issue, I emphasize again to avoid any misunderstanding,

is that we must separate the path to the end of

the war from the rest of the discussions. Now, what points

we must observe at the end of the war so that this equation- making...

- I don't understand something, Mr. Vahid. What does that mean?

For example, now we want to talk about the end of the war,

the status of the Strait must be clarified here,

and the status of reparations must be clarified.

All of this change in the nuclear doctrine that you are talking about is regarding

the nuclear Article 5,

which we don't want to talk about at all right now.

How can I make equations about something I don't even want to talk about?

No, I'm saying something else. I'm not saying...

Of course, the nuclear doctrine debate is separate from the war debate,

and it's not necessarily that. Of course, if we... let me put it bluntly,

if the issue of our uranium is not resolved, Now, for Trump's team,

Because Trump's team wants to take the uranium, claim victory, and leave. Right?

This is his exit window. Right?

Now, never mind that on the first day he started with very high- level things,

and now he is satisfied with this.

But this means for us that he wants to take the uranium,

put his mind at ease, and then,

as he put it— we had a good discussion before the show... he won't just leave;

once he takes the uranium, he won't leave, he'll come back again. - No, exactly,

he'll come back. It's a mortal danger for us.

Look, if he leaves, the Islamic Republic

of Iran and the Iranian nation must prepare themselves to start threatening

with unconventional weapons. Meaning,

to make nuclear threats,- He has already brought it up, he has already threatened.

Whether they make a biological or chemical threat,

they still have some perceptions, They say," After all,

the Iranians' hands are full." But if you give these up too,

then Why shouldn't they threaten you?

I'm talking about the bare minimum, the absolute bottom is threats.

And we are sure that this man and this ruling

body in the White House have no hesitation in making threats.

Then this threat will affect our society;

it's not like it won't have an impact.

Therefore, my point is that on the issue of...

actually, I believe on the issue of materials, sudden dilution, Well,

from my point of view, it is not acceptable.

And shipping it out is even more unacceptable.

Even if he goes and talks to the Chinese, saying," Sir, you come and accept this,"

and so on and so forth. From my point of view, it is no longer acceptable.

What I'm saying is that we must discuss... withdrawal from the NPT,

especially with that trigger mechanism that I proposed,

Someone might say we should withdraw tomorrow,

and I don't necessarily want to oppose a sudden withdrawal.

But I say, either with a trigger or a sudden exit, we must say,

we must tell the world," Sir, the era in which

Iran was 100% committed to certain issues,

with the assassination of our martyred Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah with those

formalities, is gone and over. A new era has arrived. We are negotiating with

new red lines.

That's just how it is. I might, in the area of, for example, I proposed myself,

I said," We might show some nuclear flexibility."

I am not necessarily against flexibility. But any flexibility is elastic.

It's like a spring, where the finger goes back, if its trigger is pulled,

it snaps back and even goes further forward.

Meaning, if I show flexibility, for example, I say,"

I will enrich within the framework of a consortium outside Iran, for example."

But the centrifuges...

But now Vance says," Pack up your centrifuges."

I say," No way, that's not going to happen."

The centrifuges and everything else remain in place, only...

When he sends a message saying,' At most, let me keep one facility,

for example…'— No, absolutely not…

— What he means is probably quite clear. When he sends a message saying,'

We agree to the existence of one nuclear facility in Iran,'

I'm saying blindly we should sign this.

He says,' The Tehran research reactor, you must dismantle the rest.'

— It's clear what he's referring to. No, we say,' Sir, I, with the consortium…'

With this consortium, with China and Russia, I will enrich,

I will make fuel rods and bring them to Iran into the reactors.

He sets up a bit of a consortium, I do…

But the previous mechanisms remain in place. If you betray us,

that is 1,000 meters underground, You can't bomb it, nor can you do anything,

I will start injecting again right there and go all the way up to 90 percent.

My 90 percent is also clear.

Meaning that if you came,

and from now on if you made a military threat, a nuclear threat,

If I feel that you've brought more refuelers to your bases than you've

brought for me, or if you've done anything similar,

the trigger mechanism will be activated,

and I'll go straight to what I shouldn't do.

But the point is that before that,

the nuclear doctrine must be discussed with two veto- wielding powers,

because legally, our hands are full, friends.

The blood of the resistance leader is the greatest proof of this.

I want to make it so that my new leader can easily go to the Imam

Khomeini Hosseiniyeh,

where his father used to give speeches, and give a speech.

I am not an organization, I am not a militia group, I am the country of Iran.

My president must go and sit in Pasteur comfortably, without any worries.

To this Israel whose territorial ambition is from the Nile to the Euphrates,

they have officially declared this.

They have officially declared this. Mr. Rekabi, the US ambassador,

also emphasized... I mean, confirmed it.

Tucker Carlson did a great job, he went and pulled this out of his mouth.

It shocked the countries... Arabi stood up. With great difficulty,

he pulled it out of his mouth,

He went and caught the traveler at the airport and pulled him out.- Tucker did a

very historic thing. He did a very historic thing. He proved that we were right,

that this country is inherently cancerous.

The two- state solution and all that is nonsense.

We, with this abnormal apartheid country,

established on the basis of racial supremacy,

and having infinite territorial ambitions,

and which does not adhere to anything, not even to any international rule,

how can we reach a peaceful coexistence, as some comrades put it? Which treaty?

With Trump? With Obama? With whom? With Netanyahu?

With this Netanyahu or with Naftali Bennett? What difference does it make?

This establishment is corrupt

and geopolitically, it cannot tolerate us.

Around us are also a bunch of countries that, as I say,

are either remnants of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire or the collapse of the

Soviet Union. Their establishments easily...

They get manipulated, like the UAE. Was it really in the UAE's interest to

support the war? No, no, it wasn't up to them. It wasn't up to them.

Abu Dhabi has let Israeli rulers do its thinking. Dubai is complaining,

Sharjah is complaining.

They say," Man, we were doing business here,

minding our own business as a normal country."

Now it has become a supporter of Somalia's partition,

a supporter of Libya's partition, partnering with Khalifa Haftar there,

and partnering with Somaliland here, partnering with the RSF, that Hemedti

guy or whatever, over there,

and going to Turkey to stage a coup. And this is our respectable,

business- minded neighbor. Well, by whom?

At the instigation of this very Israel.

I cannot talk about this Israel in any other way.

So what I am saying is based on reason, my friends, not emotion.

Now some might say, "

An emotional person has come on television and is saying these things."

My friends, realist logic says these things.

Mearsheimer and Walt have said this,

if you want to talk academically. If you do a simple calculation,

the fact is that we, as a country,

are unfortunately located in a region that only understands the language of force.

That's all.