English → Persian transcript

right now, left-wing agitators, they just sprayed Iran's exile crown prince with red liquid in Berlin. It is clear that the global left prefers what, Islamo-fascism, that's now in charge in Iran. Here with Reaction, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton. You know, we've been watching the steady decline in Europe. They have neglected not only NATO with their minor contribution, we paid two thirds of it, they have neglected their own national security as a continent, as individual

countries. They have allowed unfettered, illegal immigration without assimilation. You see that with Sharia courts, no go zones in Europe. And on top of that, they embraced radical socialism, alarmism, what the radical left would want to do here. When this is all said and done, and this shakes out, and they didn't have the moral clarity to stand with us against the number one state sponsor of terror, how do you see this playing out? Yes, Sean, the assault on Mr.

Pahlavi in Europe was shocking, but I can't say that it's surprising. As you said, they've had mass migration from the third world. They don't have control of their own borders. They've had left-wing radicalism for decades. That's what the left wants to bring to America as well. Did you notice that there were no protests on campus this week when Iran was talking about executing a number of female political prisoners? No left-wing agitators

in the streets. In fact, the only person that seemed to comment about it was Donald Trump asking the Iranians not to execute those female prisoners. Yet, any time the United States or Israel tries to defend ourselves, defends our people, attack a terrorist regime in Iran, you have left-wing agitators marching in the streets across America. And that's the future that the left wants for America. They look at what's going on in Europe, and they don't see

a cautionary tale. They see a roadmap. How do you explain this? It's a bit of a dichotomy that the president is asking them in one case, on the one hand, to free these women. They agree to do that. The president, on the other hand, is trying to get them to do a deal that will ensure their future and the future of their economy for them and their people, and ensure that they stay alive. And they can't resolve that part. You know, it makes it a very hard read for most Americans.

And Sean, I think this is the typical Iranian playbook. They're trying to tap America alone. Iran has never won a war, but they've never lost in negotiation. They never sat across the table negotiating with the guy that wrote The Art of the Deal. President Trump has proven time and again, from the Soleimani strike, to Operation Midnight Hammer, to Operation Epic Fury, that he won't allow the Iranians to tap him alone. He just reiterated the very clear and

simple goals. They can't have nuclear enrichment. They can't have a nuclear infrastructure. They can't have long-range offensive strike weapons or support terrorists like Hezbollah and Hamas. These have been his clearly stated goals for a decade. And if Iran thinks they're going to get the better of him at the negotiating table by dragging things out, I think they have another thing coming. And that another thing coming may be from the American military.