Transcript · English → Indonesian
Controversy Surrounding Dr. Fauci's Actions
Tentu saja, sebagai seorang dokter,
bisakah Anda berspekulasi tentang apa yang dibicarakan Hawley?
Bagaimana hal itu bisa terjadi ketika seseorang di posisi tepercaya,
seperti Dr. Fauci, bisa menghasilkan uang sampingan
sementara dia sosok tepercaya bagi Amerika di tengah krisis?
Begini, biar saya katakan bahwa
Fauci bukanlah dokter pertama yang tampil di hadapan Senat.
Kembali ke tahun 2020, saya tampil beberapa kali,
saya bersaksi dengan jujur, saya menjawab semua pertanyaan.
Jadi, jika Fauci bisa dijadikan standar acuan,
tentang apa yang harus dilakukan dokter,
menggunakan Amendemen Kelima sama sekali tidak bisa diterima,
dan sama sekali tidak dapat diterima baginya untuk
mengerahkan pekerja National Institutes of Health untuk mengurus pengajuan baginya
demi menerima penghargaan uang tunai pribadi, dan itulah yang dia lakukan.
Semua ini terungkap dalam buku hariannya.
Dia adalah aib nasional.
End of transcript · 129 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Obviously, as a doctor, can you potentially speculate as to what Hawley was talking about? How could that even happen that someone in a position of trust, like Dr. Fauci, could somehow be making money on the side while a trusted figure for America in the middle of a crisis?
Well, let me just say that Fauci is not the first doctor to appear in front of the Senate. Going back to 2020, I appeared multiple times, I testified truthfully, I answered all the questions. So if Fauci can be held up to a reference standard,
what doctors should do, taking the Fifth Amendment is completely unacceptable, and it's completely unacceptable for him to marshal National Institutes of Health workers to do applications for him to receive personal cash awards, and that's exactly what he did.
All of this came out in his diary. He's a national disgrace.
