Transcript · English → Indonesian
Legal Hearing Discussion on Evidence
Bisakah Anda membacakan aturan Utah 1102?
Karena ini poin yang sulit dipercaya bahwa Anda katakan dengan menyatakan saya tidak
boleh menarik kesimpulan berdasarkan bukti.
Anda bisa menarik kesimpulan—
Bahwa orang tidak bisa menarik kesimpulan berdasarkan bukti.
Tidak.
Itulah yang Anda katakan kepada saya.
Bukan begitu.
Saat Anda berkata, Candice, Anda tidak bisa menarik kesimpulan dari sidik jari tertulis—
Anda—Saya sedang menyampaikan argumennya sekarang
… yang mereka bisa izinkan masuk ke dalam persidangan.
Itu hanya karena hal itu dimaksudkan sebagai bukti yang relevan.
Jadi, negara bagian berkata, "Inilah yang kami punya,
inilah informasinya—"
Dia sedang dihancurkan. Dia sedang dihancurkan.
Perhatikan, saya bilang, itulah keseluruhan persidangannya
End of transcript · 104 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Could you bring up eleven O two Utah rule? 'Cause this is an unbelievable point that you're making by saying that I am not allowed to infer off of evidence. You can infer- That people can't infer off of evidence.
No. That's what you're saying to me. It's not. You-- When you say, Candice, you can't infer off the written prints- You're-- I'm giving the argument now
... which they, they can allow that into the hearing. That's just because it's just meant to be probative. And so it's the state saying, "Here's what we've got, here's the information-" He's getting cooked. He's getting cooked.
Pay attention, I'm telling you that was the entire hearing
