US Military Strategy Against Iran

The US administration is considering

renewing the broad military operation against Iran.

As The Wall Street Journal reported that one of the options on the table is

a new round of strikes, while maintaining the diplomatic path.

According to the newspaper, one option includes carrying out intensive airstrikes

lasting between 10 to 14 days, aiming to deal a heavy blow to Iran's missile

capabilities. At the heart of this proposal, US Central Command Commander Admiral

Brad Cooper believes that the limited

strikes carried out so far are no longer enough to deter Tehran and require an

increase in the intensity of the attacks. As for Trump,

he discussed with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Duncan whether he would approve the

broad plan or

choose a limited response that leaves the door to diplomacy open.

But General Duncan warns of the consequences

of any escalation and of the depletion of the US stockpile of air defense missiles.

As requirements to protect US bases and allies around the world expand.

In parallel with this military division, criticism in Congress is rising

over expanding the operation, with warnings that any broader involvement could

plunge the US deeper into the war.

Media reports quoted a US official as saying that Trump is in an escalatory mood,

especially since he

had previously hinted himself that he is inclined to renew the strikes.

If the decision moves toward a new round, the newspaper points to Israel's potential

involvement.

The crucial issue lies in evaluating the results of the previous strikes.

The Pentagon said that Iran's missile program suffered severe damage,

but intelligence estimates showed that Tehran retained part of its capabilities.

Hence, the disagreement widens between officials who believe that Iran has

rebuilt some launch pads and altered its attack patterns, and supporters who

believe a longer, more intense operation could reduce Tehran's ability to respond.