English → Arabic transcript

They found 49 countries, 500,000 people that the individuals who consumed the most salt every single day had the best blood pressure readings and the most normal blood pressure readings. And all the individuals who consumed three times

the amount the FDA tells you you should consume salt every day, every person around the world that consumed three times that amount had better blood pressure readings

than anybody who took the FDA readings. Now, they publish in the Lancet, in the UK where you are, the Lancet is a medical journal, they publish the results of the study

that the more salt someone consumes, the better their blood pressure is and the lower their risk factors for stroke and heart attack become. When you just asked me why and who benefits from this lie,

why would they tell us this lie? Did you see that when that was published by the Lancet, did you see who threatened the Lancet with pulling their funding if they published that study and don't retract it?

The American Heart Association threatened the Lancet and told them, you publish that study, we're gonna pull all of your funding. You have to retract that study. All right, so the next question for you is,

why would the American Heart Association be angry at a medical journal for publishing a study, largest one ever done in history, proving that salt intake, the more salt you eat, the lower your risk factor for high blood pressure,

strokes and heart attacks is? Why is that a threat to the American Heart Association? Which by the way, is the highest revenueing medical association in the whole world. What?

Why would the American Heart Association threaten the actual medical journal with their publishing of that study if they don't retract it? What's the threat to the American Heart Association

if that truth was to get out? The American Heart Association's 90% of all their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry, the drug makers of high blood pressure drugs and stroke drugs and heart attack drugs.

So if the majority of their funding comes to them from high blood pressure drug manufacturers like Merck, Pfizer and others, of course they're gonna see this journal as a threat and this article as a threat

because if people started eating more salt in their diet and they read that study and medical doctors got a hold of that information and that truth, they would start telling their patients to eat more salt.

Well, does Pfizer own salt companies? Not that I'm aware of. Does Merck own salt companies? Not that I'm aware of, but even if they did, salt is cheap

and it's a natural resource that you can't patent typically unless you change its formula. So this was the ultimate threat to the American Heart Association is it will reduce sales in high blood pressure medications,

stroke medications and heart disease medications if the truth gets out that salt in increased amounts than what the governments are telling us will reduce our risk of heart attacks and strokes. So who did the lie benefit the most

to tell all of society that salt is bad for you and lower your salt intake? Who did it benefit from the beginning?