Hindi → English transcript

But I had not yet realized that there is no breach for Satinder Jain to go.

Vdiksha Khushan was also playing this game.

Page 89, paragraph 1, 71, 71.

In Satinder Jain’s case, the bail application was being heard in the trial court.

The hearing had gone on for eighteen hours, the hearing had gone on for six days.

Before that, the hearing had been going on for quite a few days, and till then ED had no apprehension.

The last hearing was about to be held, it was the last date.

Suddenly ED has an apprehension, they go to the district judge.

The district judge allows the transfer, the matter comes before this honourable court.

And this honourable court grants judgment in favour of ED.

There are a lot of similarities between that case and my case.

In that case this honourable court had said…

The kind of question is not of the judge, which applies here also.

The question is not of integrity or of the judge. The question is an apprehension in the mind of a party

In that case it was the ED, in this case it is me. The question is an apprehension in the mind of the party

In that case also, this court relied upon Ranjit Thakur vs. Union of India

Relying on that judgment, the transfer application of the ED was allowed

And relying on the judgment, the transfer of the ED was allowed

For you, show those samples where relying on the judgment, it was allowed

From this, at least there should not be any doubt, so the apprehension is an apprehension when, more than anything, this is being pleaded

That then it will be considered that it is acting under the apprehension, I also feel that

In this matter, it has to be assessed for one side