Transcript · English
Discussion on China's Position in International Law
In international law, uh, unfortunately, just
like,
is, uh, just like, uh...
I, I have a note here. Uh, I think this is from China.
Uh, you should have joined the, uh, uh... And may I read it?
"China's position on the South China Sea Arbitration is clear, consistent, and
firm." They have no position. "The arbitration violates
fundamental principles of international law."
So what you signed, UNCLOS, you mean violates
international law. That's what you mean.
"The so-called award is illegal, null, and void," so say you,
"and has no binding force" because you don't want to be subjected to
UNCLOS. "China neither accepts nor recognizes the
award," of course, because you lost, "and opposes it
and will never accept any claim or action arising from it."
These are words slipped to me,
and there is a legal principle called res ipsa loquitur.
The thing speaks for itself. How can you deal with
a country in an international forum
beyond the question asked to me?
Disrespecting the organizers of this forum, how do
you expect to deal with it civilly?
I ask you the question, is this the right paper
to pose to me when I'm being asked a question on the
floor?
And how will you treat this kind of behavior?
It not only disrespects, shows, if this is a
Chinese position sent to me,
it not only disrespects international law,
throwing UNCLOS to the floor and trampling upon
it, but it also disrespects the basic decency
accorded,
that should be accorded to our most gracious hosts, the Republic of
Korea, and the rest of the audience here.
So perhaps basic decency and behavior is what
China needs to do.
Now, uh,
thank you very much.
In Filipino, „Maging disente lang kayo ng konti.
Mahiya naman kayo ng konti."
You can translate it in your own, uh, language.
Now, to go back to the question, we need to coalesce.
And secondly, this is not gray zone anymore.
This is actual coercion, bullying,
and aggression.
I will keep this paper
as a memento of how desperate China is
and how ineffective its position is in the face
of a free audience. Thank you very much for
the person who gave me this piece of paper.
You've just done your country a great service. Thank you.
And I hope you don't suffer in a gulag for it.
Thank you. I think, uh-
End of transcript · 403 words · machine translated