Investigation into Protocol Changes During War

I updated her and told her, "We're in an incident, we're in the middle of a war."

Don't do anything with it for now. It was important for me to document it so that if

someone comes along

and proves that the things I documented were different, I'll remember them differently.

They're contrary to the protocols of memorial organizations, and other things people manage in all sorts of places.

We'll have an example of that. It's a forgery.

Our working assumption as citizens should be that if it happened in this case, it happened

in additional cases

that perhaps no one caught.

I know what I know.

Factually, they instructed them to change the time of a call. Are there

other changes? I don't know. Still, I have one recommendation for the commission of inquiry

that will be established, and for the State Comptroller who took the minutes.

Don't settle for just a transcript of what was said. Demand the original

recordings.

Listen.

Listen to what was said.

Because maybe someone changed things.

I don't know, but I saw minutes that had been changed.

Now we're back again to why. What are they trying to show, that the prime minister is the only one

who functioned at the time?

Or perhaps show that the information came at an earlier time, meaning invoke the betrayal theory.

Because if they knew at 6:29 what they claimed to know at 6:40,

then maybe someone knew everything and betrayed us.

Could be.

Could be.

Because if, at 6:29, you already knew there was a war or hundreds of missiles, how did you know?

Could be.

What are you describing here? Criminal conduct, which harms the state and its security.

How is it that the police aren't turning this into an indictment?

Ask them. I know the facts. By the way, the facts that weren't disputed.

The time of the call was changed.