Transcript · English → Chinese
Understanding Electricity Through Analogies
电有点像蛋糕，只不过只有两种原料 。 倒不是说蛋糕可以只有两种原料。
所以我们不能只谈论，看，这是蛋糕。 就像是，好吧，这挺好，大家都喜欢蛋 糕。
但那蛋糕是由其他东西组成的。
简单地用电来作比喻， 在大自然中其实根本没有“电”这种 东西。
我们有“电”这个词。
但关于电，达拉德会告诉你， 而他也是从别处听来的，这不是达拉 德原创的，
放电、电波和脉冲， 源自场论之神查尔斯·布罗迪·施泰 因梅茨。
他是个侏儒，髋部像回力镖一样弯曲 ， 而且，你知道的，抽着巨大的手卷古 巴雪茄。
在你看到的照片中，他说 phi 乘以 psi， 即磁与介电。
这两样东西协同作用的乘积 构成了我们称之为电的东西
所以电本身并不是一种东西 就像蛋糕本身也不是一样
当然是了，蛋糕不就在那儿 就像，是的，蛋糕是由其他东西组成 的，你懂吧？
我觉得我在指出这一点时 把这个类比说得非常非常简练
顺便说一下，过去几天 在美国发生的事情
我要告诉你，这些所谓的权威人士 实际上是多么卑鄙的骗子
我是说，在过去的48小时里 你见过这么多的谎言吗？
我是在用类比来阐明一个观点
其他人会说，好吧，我有物理学博士 学位 你竟敢告诉我什么是电？
其实，我是在引用场论之神的话
那些真正发明了我们整个电网的人，
特斯拉、法拉第、施泰因梅茨、 亥维赛、詹姆斯·克拉克·麦克斯韦，等 等等等。
他墙上挂着博士学位证书， 但你从未定义过能量，也从未定义过 “场”这个词。
而这些人从未定义过。他们从未定义 过， 这并非我的个人观点。他们就是从未 定义过。
总之，C是以太的滞后效应。 它不是速度。它是感应率。
这就是为什么尼古拉·特斯拉说光是 以太中的声波。
声音不是一种发射物。 声音是在介质中产生扰动。
那种介质就是空气。光，就像电一样。
当然，查尔斯·法拉第和施泰因梅茨 发现的c平方分之一，却被归功于爱 因斯坦。
y等于mc平方是爱因斯坦的发现。
事实上，爱因斯坦根本没有发现这一 点。不仅詹姆斯·克拉克·麦克斯韦在他之前就使用过它，
而且第一个提到它的人，关于这个事 实有很多书，
也就是爱因斯坦剽窃的来源，是一个 叫亨利·庞加莱的人，他的书可以免费下载。
就像Henry。Henri。H- E-N-R-I。Poincaré。P-O-I-N-C-A-R-E。亨利·庞加莱。
去查查那个人。实际上是他做出了那 个发现，而不是爱因斯坦。
总之，电压之于介电性，因为电是介 电性与磁性的同质同体。
电压之于电介质，这等于电容，也等 于反空间。
这就是为什么在交流输电线中，如果 你提高电压，
反空间就会是输电线靠拢在一起，对 吧？
嗯，当你增加电压时，这在雷击中也 曾被观察到，
当然，雷电是静电，介电质会摆动到 一起，因为电压增加了。
安培量对应磁性，磁性等于空间，空 间等于力。
而具有空间性的事物当然是一个力 向量。
当你实际增加交流输电线中的安培 量时，它们实际上会向两边摆开。
因为存在更多的环形能量，即磁通量 ，它等于安培量，
它等于力，力等于空间性。
磁性与介电性的同质性，或两者的乘 积，
构成了无知的人类所称的电。
磁性是空间性的。介电性是电容，当 然也是反空间性的。
粗略地说，磁性是冲击力或针的大小 ，而介电质就是那根针。
总之，介电质是电压，而磁性是电流。
End of transcript · 733 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Electricity is kind of like a cake, except with two ingredients. Not that a cake can have two ingredients. So we can't talk about, look, here's cake. It's like, well, that's nice, and everybody loves cake. But that cake is composed of things. And to make the electricity analogy very simple, there ain't no such thing in Mother Nature as electricity. We have a word for electricity.
But electricity, and Dallard will tell you this, and he got it from, it didn't come from Dallard, electrical discharges, waves, and impulses by the god of field theory, Charles Brody Steinmetz. He was the dwarf who was bent at the hip like a boomerang and, you know, big, gigantic, rolled Cubans. In the pictures that you saw, he said phi times psi, i.e. the magnetic and the dielectric. The multiplicative of those two things in unison makes up this thing we call electricity.
So electricity is not a thing itself. Just as a cake is not a thing itself. Sure it is. There's the cake right there. It's like, yeah, the cake is composed of things. You get my point? I think I made the analogy very, very succinct in pointing that out. By the way, the past few days and what's been going on here in the United States, I'll tell you what nasty liars these people who have so-called authority actually are.
I mean, have you ever seen so much lying in the past 48 hours? I'm making a point in an analogy. Other people are like, well, I have a PhD in physics. How dare you tell me what electricity is? Well, I'm quoting the gods of field theory. The people that actually invented our entire electrical grid,
Tesla, Faraday, Steinmetz, Heaviside, James Kirk, Maxwell, on and on and on and on. He had a PhD hanging on the wall, but you have never defined energy and you have never defined the term field. And these people never have. It's not my opinion that they never have. They never have. Anyway, C is the hysteresis of the aether. It is not a speed. It is a rate of induction. This is why Nikola Tesla said light was a sound wave in the aether.
Sound is not an emission. Sound is setting up a disturbance in the medium. That medium being the air. Light, just like electricity. And of course, the 1 over c squared discovered by Charles Faraday and Steinmetz was attributed to Einstein. The y equals m c squared is Einstein's discovery. Actually, Einstein didn't discover that at all. Not only did James Kirk Maxwell use it before him,
but the first person to mention it, and there are many books about this fact, this is where Einstein stole it from, was a guy, his books are free download, called Henri Poincaré. Like Henry. Henri. H-E-N-R-I. Poincaré. P-O-I-N-C-A-R-E. Henri Poincaré. Go look that guy up. He actually came up with that discovery, not Einstein. Anyway, voltage is to dielectricity, since electricity is the consubstantiality of dielectricity and magnetism.
Voltage is to the dielectric, which is equal to capacitance, which is equal to counter space. This is why in AC power lines, if you increase the voltage, counter space would be the power lines swinging together, right? Well, when you increase the voltage, and this has been seen in lightning strikes, and of course lightning is electrostatics, dielectrics will swing together, because the voltage has been increased.
Amperage is to the magnetic, which is equal to space, which is equal to force. And something that is spatial is of course a force vector. When you actually increase the amperage in AC power lines, they'll actually swing apart. Because there is a more toroidal energy, i.e. magnetic flux, which is equal to amperage, which is equal to force, which is equal to the spatial.
The consubstantiality, or the multiplicative of the magnetic and the dielectric, makes up the thing that ignorant human beings call electricity. Magnetism is spatial. Dielectric is capacitance, and of course counter spatial. Magnetism would be, crudely, the punch, or the size of the needle, whereas the dielectric would be the needle. Anyway, dielectric is voltage, and magnetic is amperage.
