Supreme Court Judges Discuss Voting Rights

On Gyanesh Kumar and the Supreme Court, no more

scathing comment could have been made. That too by a sitting

judge, a current judge of the Supreme Court, who is retiring in 2029.

It is not that he has already retired.

Most importantly, another retired Supreme Court

judge has said that in this country, the right to vote

is now under threat. These two comments are placing the Supreme Court

especially Gyanesh Kumar, in the dock.

First, friends, on your screens, Justice Ujjal

Bhuyan, who is a sitting judge, not retired, and

has at least three years left before retirement. Please note his statement.

Any process taking away voting rights of millions of citizens

is unjustifiable. No court can condone it.

In simple words, Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said

That an Indian citizen's right to vote is part of the Constitution's basic structure

and an integral part. If, through any process, a large number of

citizens are deprived of their right to vote, then that would in itself

be arbitrary and violate Articles 14 and

326 of the Constitution. Justice Bhuiyan said that the right to vote

is not merely a right granted by law, but a right granted by the

Constitution. Article 326 of the Constitution guarantees

that elections to the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies

will be based on adult suffrage.

130 million. Consider this number, friends. Through SIR, 130 million voters were removed from this country.

Remember

that business newspaper's report, which said that we had gone back ten years.

That is, there are now as many voters as there were in 2015.

The number of voters should increase again

But the Election Commission is curtailing it.

On your screens, Justice Rohinton Nariman.

He is a Supreme Court judge

and in his scathing statement, he said that our

right to vote is under threat. Note

what Justice Rohinton Nariman says on your screens.

First,

the right to vote. The heart of our Constitution and democracy, the right to

vote, is in great danger. What did he say about the Election Commission?

There cannot be an Election Commission that works like this or simply does not

work properly. Regarding one commissioner's decision, he mentioned reports

stating that despite the objections of the other two Election Commissioners,

the Chief Election Commissioner made key decisions. On the appointment of Election

Commissioners, he criticised the 2023 law

under which the power to appoint Election Commissioners lies with the central government

It is. They appealed to the Supreme Court over the petition challenging that law

to decide on it promptly.