Persian → English transcript

And on our own initiative, we must deal with them directly,

meaning we must face these two superpowers and raise various economic,

and security issues, and there is a very important topic we must discuss with them.

And that is the discussion of changing our nuclear doctrine.

I mean, I think this issue is unfortunately lost in our discourse. Do we really think

that we are going to deal with the US as before?

Well, well. Now a new topic has been raised.

You are talking about changing the nuclear doctrine, because until now the assumption…

No, this is one of the issues that must be discussed with these two new veto-wielding powers.

Because changing the nuclear doctrine is definitely related to Article Ten of the NPT, definitely to Chapter

Seven, and many other things. Well, please explain these.

Well, meaning that our point here is that there is a key issue that the powers in the discussion of

the Non-Proliferation Treaty

That we, in a way, after all... in that very NPT we signed, there is an Article 10.

It says, look, if a country feels that its supreme security interests are threatened,

it can withdraw from this treaty.

Now, later, amendments were added to this article, saying it's not that simple, this

must be reported to the Security Council, 90 days and so on and so forth. Okay.

that in the history of international relations, a country like us

has never existed that 01:12,000 --> 01:22,000 is a member of the NPT, is under the Agency's supervision,

is negotiating, and is also ready to make unprecedented concessions,

and bomb it, assassinate the mastermind of its nuclear weapons program

right in the middle of Tehran,

make nuclear threats several times, threaten its infrastructure several times,

and threaten to destroy its civilization,

bomb its nuclear facilities, and then the Agency and

the UN and others wouldn't say a single word.

If any country in the history of international relations has the right to

withdraw from the NPT under Article 10, it is us.

Now, Europe, the West, and others might not accept this from us,

just as they acted unfairly and illegally regarding the snapback issue, while China and Russia

supported us,

supported us,

Well, that's another discussion now. Is this side of the discussion with China?

I mean, look, no, I'm saying first we should know

that we can discuss many things with great powers, including this, right?

And this is actually a very important issue.

Our adversary is Israel, which, even if we reach an agreement with America now,

داره که تمام سران نظام ما منجمله نظامی،

and political ones.

Didn't they also attack you during the 33-Day War?

If that divine miracle hadn't happened, everyone would have been killed.

If that divine miracle hadn't happened, everyone would have been killed.

high-ranking officials,

our analysis in the previous program was the same,

دسترسی پیدا بکنه، نقطه آغاز جنگه دیگه.

Well, what does this guy understand? I mean, how can Israel's word

be trusted?

چه چیزی بازدارندهست؟

What deterrent mechanism is there so that if

they come and threaten our Leader, threaten our President,

threaten our Speaker of Parliament, we can respond to them?

These are questions that must be thought about. I don't want to now,

I'm speaking as an expert, but I'm saying this very seriously.

I'm speaking as an expert, but I'm saying this very seriously.

Right now, we must think about changing our nuclear doctrine, with the mechanism...

Now, someone might say let's finish the job tomorrow morning, but I don't have such...

What exactly would be the start of it? It would start with leaving... meaning the NPT issue.

Leaving the NPT.

Are you saying that based on Article 10, we should withdraw from the NPT?

Look, someone might say we should leave now,

I myself say that right now, our parliament

and SNSC should pass a law saying, 'If you make one more threat, we will withdraw from the NPT.'

We already have a law, and you are right.

The parliament has a law to cut cooperation with the Agency, but

The parliament has a law to cut cooperation with the Agency, but

as far as I know, the issue of withdrawing from the NPT is not explicitly in it.

say, look, the parliament, the SNSC must pass a trigger law,

stating that one more threat is equal to our automatic withdrawal from the NPT.

We should also send the letter to the Security Council so that the 90-day notice is served.

Right? 03:50,000 --> 04:01,000 Legal discussions have nuances, I understand, but I

am talking about something beyond all legal issues, and that is national security.

Israel and the United States, in this war, especially these 50 days, have

crossed red lines they had never crossed before. They did during the 33-day war too, but

but in these 50 days, the talk... I mean, Trump's threats,

of infrastructure war, assassinating the Leader of the Revolution,

and, let me tell you, hitting infrastructure, the killing of your children in Gaza and Lebanon,

These were all red lines that they crossed.

And if they don't pay the price,

we must be sure that they will repeat crossing these red lines in the future.

Meaning, a mechanism must be put in place so that when they cross a red line,

they know it is not without cost 04:33,000 --> 04:40,000 for them, and it never will be.

You agree with this, but you who say, look, let's assume we finally

to any group...