Concerns Over WHO Pandemic Treaty Changes

We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the

biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently,

um, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub-subject, if, if they can make this

work, to vaccines developed in a hundred days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do, and one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO

to bring this forward. Um, other things that, uh, the amendments do is to bind the state so they're no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts, uh, provide a

liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, um, enforce digital passports, and the Director-General of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic

exists. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Uh, also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared.

Obviously, the budget will increase. Um, One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO, with these

documents, to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants,

water systems, ecosystems are all central to health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.