English → Chinese transcript
数十年来，雷·库兹韦尔一直是 超人类主义运动的非官方代言人。
在2008年，他说人类将被注入纳米机 器人， 这会极大地
改善人类的身体。
如果你展望到2045年，那也只有， 你知道，从现在起40年，我们的大部分 智能
也就是我们人类文明的智能，将是非 生物的， 我们将把这放入我们的身体
和大脑中。
所以我们将成为机器，但不是， 如果你这么说，人们就会说，好吧，
我不想成为机器，因为他们想到的是 我们所知道的机器，
那些来自19世纪的机器，它们远不如 人类， 而今天的机器也仍然不如
人类。
我说的是一种新型的机器，它实际上 更强大、 更微妙、更柔韧，
比人类更聪明、更有创意、更美丽。
2010年，他采访了罗伯特·弗雷塔斯 探讨纳米技术的未来，对方表示
纳米机器人可以治愈衰老和死亡。
医疗纳米机器人确实有潜力 或多或少地无限延长人类寿命。
那么你对死亡的角色有什么看法， 我们真的需要死亡吗？
死亡意味着终结。
它是生命的终结。
它是进步的终结。
它是思想的终结。
它是需要被治愈的东西。
衰老是一种疾病。
它是一种可以治愈的疾病。
纳米医学就是治愈这种疾病的良药。
他说，这项技术预计将在2020年前部 署， 并且将制定法律
来保护公众免受其滥用的危害。
我预计，到纳米机器人部署的时候， 大概会在2020年代的某个时候
或者到2030年代，我们将制定一整套 法律、法规，还会有
你可以做和不能做的事情。
这些法律从未实施，但该技术已获得 专利，并部署到了数十亿
人身上，而他们在2020年对此一无所 知。
我们知道这一点，是因为几家独立实 验室已证实了这种纳米技术的存在
在新冠疫苗中。
比尔·盖茨最近也承认了这一点。
制造mRNA非常容易，而且非常便宜。
这就是这玩意的神奇之处。
但毫无疑问，在接下来的五年里，我 们可以，你知道，我们只需要摸索尝试。
这里有很多脂质纳米颗粒，有些非常 具有自组装性。
在纳米机器人领域，自组装和自我复 制似乎是同一种技术。
这被认为是使用这项技术所带来的 最大危险。
自我复制会引发疾病。
纳米机器人由类金刚石制成， 天生比生物系统强大得多。
所以如果它们自我复制，那种所谓的 “疾病”
可能会是比生物疾病更棘手的问题。
首先，在纳米技术领域中， 自我复制的可行性有多大？
作为一个通用原则，你不会想把
自我复制的纳米机器人放入人体内。
我想并非所有人都会同意我这一点。
但我认为这是我们能最好地保障安 全的方法。
如果这些机器人，即纳米机器人，能 在人体内复制，
那意味着它们正将人体的某些成分 作为食物。
而我们不希望他们这样做。
在1986年出版的《创造的发动机》一书 中， 金·埃里克·德雷克斯勒写到了他所 称的
“大粘液情景”，一种由失控、自我复制 的
纳米技术引起的、会消耗宿主生物质 的假设性灾难。
而这正是独立研究人员所发现的。
这解释了在死者体内发现的、所谓的 巨大血栓。
而且它正在传播。
有证据表明，接种者正将此传播给未 接种者。
我们该如何阻止恐怖分子或一心想 要破坏的人 去创造这样一个
自我复制的系统？
不幸的是，恐怖袭击仍会发生， 因为人类就是如此。
因此，在这个纳米工厂时代， 我们需要的是某种等同于
向消防部门。
希望这类事件会非常少， 但我们将建立一个应急机制，
专门用来应对这类事件。
但这一事件是全球性的， 而且没有设立任何机构来扑灭这场 大火。
我们的政府甚至没有讨论这个问题， 而幕后黑手正在策划
通过另一场虚假疫情 来部署第二轮纳米机器人。
如果我们人民现在无法团结一致， 那我们究竟算什么？
InfoWars 报道，我是格雷格·里斯。
End of transcript · 775 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
For decades, Ray Kurzweil has been an unofficial spokesman for the transhumanist movement. And in 2008, he said that humans would become infused with nanorobots, which would vastly improve the human body. If you go out even to 2045, that's only, you know, four decades from now, most of our intelligence of our human civilization will be non-biological, we're going to put this inside our bodies
and brains. So we're going to become machines, but not, and if you say that, then people go, well, I don't want to become a machine, because they're thinking of machines as we knew them from the 19th century, which were much lesser than humans and machines today are still lesser than humans.
I'm talking about a new type of machine that's actually greater, more subtle, more supple, more intelligent, more creative, more beautiful than humans. In 2010, he interviewed Robert Freitas on the future of nanotechnology, who said that nanorobots could cure aging and death. Medical nanorobots really have the potential to extend human life more or less indefinitely.
So what's your view about the role of death and do we need death? Death is something that is an end. It's an end to life. It's an end to progress. It's an end to thoughts.
It's something to be cured. Aging is a disease. It's a curable disease. Nanomedicine is the cure for that disease. He said that this technology is expected to be deployed by 2020 and that laws will be
in place to protect the public from its misuse. I expect that by the time nanorobots are deployed, which will be sometime perhaps in the 2020s or the 2030s, we will have a whole set of laws in place, regulations, there will be things you can and cannot do. The laws were never put in place, but the technology was patented and deployed to billions
of people without their knowledge in 2020. We know this because several independent labs have confirmed the presence of this nanotechnology in the COVID vaccines. And Bill Gates recently admitted to this as well. Making the mRNA is really easy and really cheap.
And that's the magic of this thing. But there's no doubt in the next five years, we can, you know, we just need to mess around. There's a lot of lipid nanoparticles and some are very self-assembly. Self-assembly and self-replication seem to be the same technology when it comes to nanorobots. And this was considered to be the greatest danger involved with the use of this technology.
Self-replication causes disease. Nanorobots are inherently much stronger than biological systems being built of diamondoids. So if they self-replicate, that disease, quote unquote, could be even a tougher problem than biological disease. So first of all, what's the feasibility of self-replication in the nanotechnology world?
As a general principle, you do not want to put self-replicating nanorobots inside the human body. I suppose not everybody agrees with me on that. But that is the way I think that we can best guarantee safety. If the robots, nanorobots are able to replicate inside the human body, that means they're
using some component of the human body as food. And we don't want them to be doing that. In his 1986 book, Engines of Creation, Kim Eric Drexler wrote about what he termed the Great Goo Scenario, a hypothetical catastrophic event caused by out-of-control, self-replicating nanotechnology, which consumes the biomass of the host.
And this is exactly what independent researchers are finding. It explains the large, so-called blood clots being found in the dead. And it's spreading. Evidence shows that the vaxxed are shedding this to the unvaxxed. How do we prevent a terrorist or someone who's bent on destruction from creating such a
self-replicating system? There will be some terrorist acts because that's what humans do, unfortunately. So what we're going to be needing in this era of nanofactories is something equivalent to the fire department. Hopefully the incidents will be very few, but we will have an emergency regime which
is set up to deal with that type of event. But the event is worldwide and there is no agency set up to put out this fire. Our governments are not even discussing the problem and the perpetrators are planning a second round of nanobot deployment with another fake pandemic. If we the people cannot unite and stand together now, then what exactly are we?
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
