Discussion on Generational Differences in Court

By the way, what's, uh, what are your ages?

Uh, my, my client-

Yes, the two of you.

Saurav is twenty-seven.

Twenty-seven and-- I just... Twenty-seven and thirty-one.

So that means you're not... Twenty means Gen Z.

Your Honor, sir, I don't know the-

I-

Saurav is technically.

No, that persons of the age of twenty and above,

students who just crossed out of college will come in this

regime. What is Gen Z?

After '97.

'97.

'97.

So who are millennials then?

Millennials are, uh, until- Well, since I'm a millennial, uh,

it's, uh-

Born from thousand-

Until '97,

uh, after seventeen-

So which means exactly. So that you're no longer, both of you

are not Gen Z.

We are an inspiration.

Your Honor.

Saurav technically is. Your Honor, there is no legally defined,

so we don't know.

We don't know.

No, no, please understand why I'm asking this

question.

Your

Honor.

You see, in the first instance, then, then things were different. It

was students.

That's right.

And then it was students protest, children were there.

Yes.

They were all these children. But now it's another

cause.

Your Honor.

So therefore, people remain the same, cause is

changing.

Your Honor.

Correct? Then the next question would be: Who are you?

Your Honor.

Who are you? What are you?

What is your association? What is it meant for?

What is the purport of the association?

See, these are-

With great respect, that does not fall within-

No, no.

None of them will be-

These are very, very important questions.

Please understand. When, when there is an apprehension of peace and

tranquility, or rather let's not go into the definition

of an

offense, of a cognizable offense of tranquility.

But when there's a question of breach of peace, all these questions

will assume importance-

Surely, sure

... of who you are, what are you. When you came out the first time in the

first protest in June, July, August.

Your Honor.

When the persons, the, the organization continues, but the

cause changes, then the cause again changes,

then the cause again changes.

So therefore, where there are such group of persons whose causes

keep on changing-

Mm

... in terms of protest. Right? So protest, no doubt.

Yes.

Correct.

But focus again not... See, the question is when the, when the

magistrate goes into these questions of a necessity of breach of

tranquility, then all these questions

assume significance and importance as to who you are, what

is your

motive, what are you trying to do. We suddenly hear-

About. And none of it is being done.

Something like a regime change. We suddenly hear something like something

which is

via, which we normally do by a ballot. See, I...

The point is that in a, in a hearing like this,

it is not necessary for us

to go into these questions.

No.

Keep the debate on

in an appropriate proceeding at an appropriate place.

Not now, when it's a question of only a question

of-

Well, also that would-

... an insistence of a bond. Because then please understand, in a two

hours I'll have, I'll have to go into the questions.

Your Honor, with great respect, if, if, if-

What is your, what is your purport?

Uh, uh,

what do you do otherwise in life?

Well, also we are open to all of those

questions.

My, my issue today is with the 19th order