hebrew → English transcript

I don't want to nitpick the legal text, but I'm saying that if, according to your method, the people's sovereignty has overstepped its authority as the sovereign,

it is the role and duty of the Supreme Court to strike it down. Where is that written? The answer is that it's not written, just as you don't need to pass a law. No, I'm saying I'm not willing for the court to strike something down,

that isn't based on what's written in the constitution. Then you don't need to pass a law.

It's not written in law that you need to pass a law. Why? I don't understand the comparison. The court... I'm very legalistic, so I'm saying you're looking for everything to be written down,

There are things... not everything... Democracy is also about principles. Principles strong enough to nullify a law must be written in a constitution. So the principle of democracy, the rule of law, and separation of powers are strong enough.

Montesquieu and the separation of powers are only compelling to you when they're in a constitution.

Montesquieu and the separation of powers are only compelling to you when they're in a constitution.