Concerns Over WHO Pandemic Treaty

We're undergoing a soft coup,

and the idea is to

create a whole new set of laws and ignore the

existing human rights laws and other laws

under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the

biosecurity agenda. The WHO is

developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the

United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to

the existing international health regulations that will

remove the human rights protections currently,

um, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce

surveillance censorship, get rid of freedom of

speech, require

governments to censor and only push a

single narrative.

Also, we will be sub-subject, if, if they can make this

work, to vaccines developed in a hundred days,

which the

organization CEPI is planning to do, and

one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy

Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO

to bring this

forward.

Um, other things that, uh, the amendments do is to bind the

state so they are no longer recommendations, but enforceable

edicts, uh, provide a liability shield,

get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one

country to another, um, enforce digital passports,

and the director general of WHO can

demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic

exists. He can just declare it with no standards,

and then countries around the world will have to obey.

Uh, also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can

and can't

use in your nation once a pandemic is declared.

Obviously, the budget will increase.

Um,

One Health is another part of this.

One Health is a concept that was created to

enable the WHO, with these documents,

to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world

by saying that climate change, animals,

plants,

water systems, ecosystems are all

central to health.

Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar

notion that humans are no longer of greater value than

animals.