HIV Isolation and Scientific Misconceptions

The question is if HIV has been ever isolated, and the clear answer is no, and I'll explain you what they did instead. We have to go back in the history of biology, let's say to the year 1970,

where the activity of a certain enzyme, the reverse transcriptase, was believed as a proof of the existence of a new type of viruses, the retroviruses. It soon turned out to be wrong,

because the activity of this enzyme can be found in all human beings, in all mammals, in all plants. So, this working hypothesis proved wrong, but what happened in the meantime, we did have some molecular techniques,

saying we isolate under certain conditions some proteins, which we are said to be specific for this virus, but of course never the whole. They had never isolated all proteins from a viral isolation, out of such a test tube, for example,

at least it was never demonstrated. And what they did instead, I'm going to show you right now. The secret of this kind of science is that they have established cells which were able to grow outside the body,

right? And the secret is all in there. Those cell lines have certain characteristics when treated in a very special way. So, they add inside plant hormones,

hydrocortisone, mitogens, oxidizing agents, etc. And then the cell line reacts, of course, in a certain way, producing the signs of reverse transcriptase activity. Of course, they say it's only because we added blood,

or parts of the blood serum, from a patient together, and this results in the production of virus, because somewhere there's a virus inside, and it will infect this susceptible cell line, resulting in further amplification or replication of the viruses.

And that is absolutely wrong, because if you take those cell lines, these special cell lines, and take blood of what they say is an uninfected person, and you do it the same,

exactly the same way. Keep in mind that blood control won't appear in any AIDS publication, so it will result in the same way. Of course, if they take only material from a patient, they never will succeed in viral isolation.

They may detect a certain protein of a given size, saying, well, this is part of HIV. They will find stretches of genetic material, amplified with PCR, saying, well, this is part of HIV. And this is absolutely wrong.

I explain you why. First, what they sell us, or what they sold the world as being viral particles, are not viral particles. And I'm just going to borrow you the latest issue of Scientific American.

And there you will find on page 50 the explanation of what they are showing to us. Cellular particles for export-import of proteins and other materials produced by certain cells. And they look exactly the same, what they are showing us, as HIV.

So this is one explanation for what we see in those electron micrographs. And on the molecular level, they detect HIV only by indirect means. They say, if you are positive, it means if you have antibody against some proteins,

you are positive. But it's a clear circular argument, because they have no viral proteins. They just come up using proteins, which in the mixture of those cells and those cells were prepared under severe conditions,

isolating the proteins without showing this gel, using those proteins in the AIDS test, in the HIV antibody test, wrongly claiming those are HIV specific proteins. And if you bind against those proteins, you said you are HIV positive.

But this is a circular argument, because they produced, under very stressful conditions, those proteins. And imagine, if your body, under very stressful conditions, produces the same proteins,

your body reacts in building antibodies against those proteins, thus resulting in positivity. And of course, if you think about the hemophiliacs, which since 1969 were given prophylactically Factor VIII preparation, which was forbidden before, because they were afraid of antibody production against those Factor VIII preparations,

because they are very impure. Only 0.3% is pure activity. The rest is cellular, debris, proteins, foreign proteins. They are all the little diseases coming from, in the case of hemophiliacs. And of course, this results in positivity.

They have huge amounts of foreign proteins introduced to their body. The body makes antibodies against, and then they come up with a positive HIV test. How is it possible that there are so many papers that have the word isolation of HIV in the title,

if it's never been achieved? Well, I think this is just the central dogma in this kind of science. For example, if you just look in such kind of books or various other books around retroviral testing or testing for HIV,

you find the central dogma in the very beginning. It's just saying retroviruses are the cause of considerable human morbidity and mortality. Essentials for quality control and laboratory diagnosis. And you will find no single reference even where the proteins, the antigens used in all those tests were isolated from.

You see, this is the hidden agenda. They say in their mixture what they are doing, this business in the lab. That they create viruses and vile proteins. And this is a case of self-deception, at least.

And deception in case of all other scientists who were supplied by cloned genetic structures set to represent parts of the HIV genome. Working with this and believing that the original isolation has been performed in a proper way.