Discussion on AI Regulation and Leadership

Of social development. You know, that's way outside,

um, what these companies are focused on.

They're going, you know, very quickly and amazingly in terms of the, the

depths of the models. And so, you know, where is society

engaging on this? It's not the role of the industry to

self-regulate or understand the whole of society impact that,

uh, comes out of AI.

And you've talked about the creation of some sort of international organization to

manage AI's use and, and monitor AI, and the importance of getting the US

and China

involved in that. H- have you got a sense of where the

leadership for something

like that should come from, how it should emerge?

Well, since World War II, the US has often been a

benign leader of global initiatives, you know, whether it's

the creation of the UN itself with others, um,

you know, thinking about

nuclear weapons or ozone layer or aviation safety.

Uh, and so here, if,

you know, if people see this as, as important as I do,

the capacity of the US government to work domestically and in a friendly

way, reach out to others, you know, and, and see what they're

doing.

Just doesn't feel that's the way the administration is going.

The depth of understanding of AI and the right concern about some of these

bad things, uh, is too low in

every entity, including the government, other than the industry

itself. Uh, there's not many industries

that have been like, "Wow,

our, our tool we'll have to be careful with."

And, and that's very appropriate here

because it is, you know, so uniquely powerful.

But-