Transcript · English → Chinese
English → Chinese transcript
你是说，有可能以这种方式产生的电 流也有可能导致心脏病吗
以及／或者中风，对吗
你得知道，这个想法对很多人来说都 太震撼了，包括我在内。我很清楚这一点
罗伯特·贝克医生是纽约州锡拉丘兹 退伍军人管理局的骨科外科主任兼医学调查员
20年来，他和他的团队一直在做实验， 研究低剂量辐射对生物是否会产生任何影响
他是全世界一个虽小但在不断壮大 的科学家群体中的一员，这些科学家不断发现新的信息，使他们相信低剂量…
电场确实会影响我们
比如，使用极低电压的电流。他曾让 那些本来无法自行愈合的骨折重新长到一起，而且
就像大多数科学发现一样
如果这些精心控制的低强度电流能 够治愈骨骼，那它就是一把双刃剑。
嗯 这会让像贝克尔这样的人开始怀疑 家用电器、高压电线和航海者产生的 不受控制的电场
是首个
评估“血色计划”所做生物学研究的 临时委员会成员之一 并且
我当然就坐在那里听完了全部内容
有几项研究产生了非常明确的影响。 是的
暴露在这种环境中的动物比对照动 物生长得更慢。许多项目都证明了这一点
这
第二个领域是
确实出现明显影响的第二个领域是， 这种类型的场暴露似乎会产生压力。海军真的
把那份报告压下来了两年多吗
海军并没有广泛传播这份报告
这就是他所说的那份报告 是一群顶尖科学家 应海军的请求完成的
他们审查了关于极低频电磁辐射对 生物体 可能影响的实验 并提出了一些警示 那是在
1973年 我们所知的 我相信是五个
具体项目中
得到了哪些积极的结果？
当这些项目被终止、资金就这样消失 后，就再也没有钱继续开展这项工作了
那么，这是不是一种固定的模式？ 看起来是的，因为当一项研究开始发 现可能存在不良影响时
资金就会枯竭，甚至不只是发现不良 影响
任何影响
End of transcript · 394 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Are you telling me there's a possibility that electric current generated in a fashion such as this could possibly cause heart disease And or stroke yes You have to know that that's a mind-blowing thought for a lot of people including me. I'm aware of that Dr. Robert Becker is chief of orthopedic surgery and a medical investigator for the Veterans Administration in Syracuse, New York For 20 years he and his staff have been experimenting on the effects if any of low-level radiation on living things
He is one of a small but growing group of scientists around the world who are turning up information making them believe that low-level Electrical fields do affect us For instance using very low voltage currents. He has made broken bones that wouldn't heal by themselves grow together again and And like most scientific discoveries It's a double-edged sword if those carefully controlled low-level currents can heal bones
Well, it makes people like Becker wonder about uncontrolled electrical fields from household appliances power lines and seafarer. I was a member of the first ad-hoc committee to evaluate the biological studies that were performed for project sanguine and I most certainly sat there and listened to Several studies that had very definite effects. Yes
Animals are exposed grow at a slower rate than control animals. A number of projects have shown this to be true the second area in which Definite effects do appear is that exposure to this type of field seems to produce stress. Is it true that the Navy? Repressed that report for better than two years
The Navy did not disseminate the report widely This is the report he's talking about it was done at the request of the Navy by a group of top scientists They reviewed experiments performed on possible effects of ELF radiation on living things and raised some red flags. That was in 1973 we know of I believe it's five specific projects in
Which positive results were obtained? When the projects were terminated and the money just disappeared there was no more to continue the work Now, is this a definite pattern? It appears to be that when a study begins to find that there may be adverse effects That the money drives up not even adverse effects any effect
