Election Commission Appointment Concerns

Whether it is the State Election Commissioner or the Central Election Commissioner,

ruling parties should not be allowed to nominate them.

Earlier, at the Centre,

YSRCP then supported the process of the ruling party making such nominations.

It supported it.

But today, we regret it.

We regret making the mistake of supporting it.

Because an examiner cannot be appointed by the student.

No matter how honest the examiner is,

criticism

is something the examiner will certainly face.

If the appointment is not made by a neutral body.

So, a neutral body must be restored.

The Leader of the Opposition,

the CJI,

and the Prime Minister, all three must exercise their right to vote.

Then the CJI will remain neutral. It will appear to be a neutral body.

It will be seen as a neutral body.

What is the situation now? The Prime Minister,

a minister nominated by the Prime Minister,

a Union minister. The two of them have two votes,

The Leader of the Opposition gets one vote.

The CJI stepped aside.

This is a flaw in the system.

Since the two votes go to one side,

That central— that Central Chief Election Commissioner

and the SCCs at the state level are all nominated by

the government in power.

This is a flaw in the system.

Until this flaw is repaired, this system will not improve.

We, too,

realized this only after making mistakes.

In this context, corrections should enter this system, which is why

we are strongly demanding it.

We must demand it, too.

Every democrat, in this direction, sooner or later, in this direction,

will have faith in these systems only when this reform takes place.

There will be faith in the matter of the electoral process.

This reform must also come to the State Election Commission.

The State Election Commission should not be appointed by the Chief Minister or by the

The ruling government… It should be appointed by someone

neutral.