Critique of Media Coverage on Protests

Aren't they ashamed to publish newspapers like this? This is today's Times of India.

Now look at their headline.

That the cops blocked the protesters.

Like a goalkeeper blocks a goal, right?

And Nadda ji is meeting.

Other newspapers at least admit that,

brother, it was the biggest protest in the last 14 years.

Whatever other news they gave or didn't give.

On the front page,

they do say that there was a baton charge, and tear gas cannons were used.

There is no mention of some things.

Look at the subheading.

It says, " 118 cops and 60 marchers injured."

Didn't you know?

Delhi Police got beaten up so much yesterday?

Another newspaper,' The Hindu', gives the exact figure,

at least 103 are reported from two hospitals where protesters have been admitted.

And they say, 60. Look at the photo.

They put a photo of a protester throwing stones.

The photo is on the front page.

The internet is full of photos,

photos of the police throwing stones.

The police bring vehicles filled with stones.

This gentleman publishes these photos.

There is no news of the lathi charge, of the brutality.

Look at their language,

I mean, hats off to this language.

They say, Protest... " Thousands of

protesters ran into police barricades, lathis and tear gas."

Meaning, the poor policemen were

practicing swinging their lathis and these protesters came and ran into them.

They were playing with tear gas like this,

and these people came and got caught in it.

This is the kind of news the Israeli press publishes about Palestine.

How do these people show this newspaper to their children the next morning?

The newspaper should be named"

Lies of India".