Discussion on Public Health and Liberty

My job here is not to convince you of a thing.

My job here is to merely present the context that says that

there is no question

that the entirety of what we've been through over the last four years has

been merely an orchestration to assault the liberties of

people here in this country and around the world.

Pretending that this is some sort of public health emergency,

pretending this is a justification for the

inconceivable threat to liberties and the violation of

human rights is actually nothing more than to give lip service to

tyrants.

And the fact of the matter is, the evidence starts here in the UK in

nineteen

sixty-six. Your own Wellcome Trust was the one who

decided to fund the coronavirus as the preferred form of human

manipulation in nineteen sixty-six.

It was one year later that the United States

and the UK got into an agreement that

said that we were going to modify and manipulate coronavirus to see what

could

be done to infect, quote, a healthy population, end

quote. That was nineteen sixty-seven, the year of my birth.

So this slow-moving train wreck that we call Operation Warp

Speed only took fifty-six short, short

years to come into being.

And in two thousand and eleven, in the document that

is imaged on the left,

which unfortunately given the size of the screen is pretty much illegible, but you

can go find it.

A antitrust collusion, and I'm using that term quite literally,

between the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation,

the Gates Foundation,

NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control

and Prevention got together and established a

mandate that said that by twenty twenty the world would

accept, and I

quote, a universal vaccine, end quote,

by the end of twenty twenty.

Now, these folks apparently had a divining rod

or some sort of mysterious bubble

that they could look into to, to see the future with such accuracy and

elegance that they actually identified back then that coronavirus might be the

thing that would be just what nature needed in order for that to

happen.

And by twenty fifteen we had the public statement, and I need to

read this into the record. "To sustain the funding base

beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public

understanding of

the need for medical countermeasures such as a pandemfluenza or

pancoronavirus vaccine." Let me pause for a moment.

When this statement was made, the World Health Organization had

officially declared

coronavirus

a eradicated disease.

In what world do we need a vaccine for a disease that the World Health

Organization, in its own infinite wisdom, has declared eradicated?

Question. Just sit on that for a moment.

But let's go on. A key driver is the media and the

economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to

our advantage to get to the real issues.

Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the

process.

Does that sound like a public health emergency to you?

Or does that sound like a statement of treason?

That is an act of domestic and international terrorism, and

that should be

admission of that act.

And just in a few short days, we will have the author of that statement,

one Peter Daszak, testifying in Congress that this thing

probably slipped him out of a, a, a random event that took place in

Wuhan, China, where a bat and a pangolin got together, and voila,

in December, we were there. That's a quote from twenty fifteen

in the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

That's the conspiracy level language I'm using.

Now, by the way, I'm using the term conspiracy in the legal

definition of the term.

This is the admission of conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism.

And one year later, the last image you see on this screen, one

year later was the announcement, and I'm quoting, that the

Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one was, and I quote,

poised for human emergence, end quote.

That was two thousand and sixteen.

That's the proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

That's the conspiracy that I'm apparently representing.

Next slide.

Now, the evidence for all of you who doubt the

merits of the argument

that I'm making is right in front of you.

In two thousand and two, the upper left, you see the first patent in two thousand

and two filed on the synthetic

chimeric coronavirus, which, as I've said in many instances,

was actually patented to be infectious and replication-defective.

What that means is it's actually weaponized.

That's not an allegation, that's a statement of fact, because in two

thousand and five, you see at the bottom of the curriculum

vitae of one Ralph

Baric, line fifty-seven, I believe that is, of his bio

says, "Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking,

biological warfare enabling technologies."

Does anyone actually want to just muse for a moment what he could have

potentially meant when he said biological warfare-enabling

technology?

Does that sound like a public health response?

Does that sound like a P-three program where we're trying to figure out

how to treat this thing? Is that what it sounds like?

Or is there an outside chance that the reason why he unleashed

ten million dollars that year and every other year in

non-competitive grants from all of the above-referenced

agencies, is there any chance that the reason why is because they

were actually

building, are you ready for this? Biological weapons.

Now, I haven't had the credential in the United

States since two thousand and two

of being a biological weapons inspector. I know of what I speak.

And the fact of the matter is I briefed this matter first in two

thousand and two.

I consistently briefed this ever since.

And when in two thousand and nineteen, September eighteenth, two

thousand and nineteen, we actually had the World Health

Organization's Global

Preparedness Monitoring Board announce

that there was going to be, in the time between September

nineteenth, twenty nineteen and

September of twenty twenty, there was going to be,

are you ready for this? An accidental or intentional release of a respiratory

pathogen. There's an operative word in

that statement that's quite alarming, isn't there?

Released.

That's not a leak. That's not an accidental escape.

They used the word release. They didn't use there might be an

accident.

Let's go-