Transcript · English → Chinese
Understanding Aether Cosmology and Observation
每一天,无论你身在何处,或认为自 己住在哪里,
你抬头仰望,会看到天空在移动。
太阳在空中划过一道弧线。
群星自东方升起,在头顶旋转,
然后消失在西方。
月亮遵循着自己的轨迹。
行星在星空背景下缓慢漂移。
如果你熬得足够久,并且留心观察,
你会开始注意到一些规律和节奏,
它们以极高的精度周而复始,历经数 日、数月,
以及数年。
你不需要任何理论来观察这一切。
你只需要去看。
但在那种观察
与对它的解释之间,一套假设
被悄然引入。
也许是地球的特定大小,
与太阳的特定距离,或是某种特定的 几何结构,
框定了你所看到的一切
在你甚至还没来得及问
它是否能独立契合。
但如果你能抛开这一切,重新开始
仅从观察者出发,这就是整个
以太宇宙学概念模型的基础。
它是围绕着单一观察者— —也就是你来构建的,
你所站立的位置,你从那里能看到什 么,
以及天空的几何形状,正如它实际上
从你在地球上的位置所呈现的那样。
这是很容易被遗忘的一点。
同样,地球上的每一位观察者,无论 身在何处,
在任何特定时刻都只能看到整整一 半的天空。
没有人能看到整个天空。
每个人都只能看到一半,即一个观测 半球,
这是你所处的地点和时间所独有的。
你今晚在纽约看到的天空
与你在悉尼看到的天空并不相同。
他们正看着落下的太阳,你却正看着 它升起。
你能看见的星星在他们的地平线以 下。
你们每个人都有自己的视觉穹顶,
有自己专属的表观天空,以及个人可 观测的
半球。
这两种模型之间的争论
是围绕着是什么造成了这种区别展 开的。
球体模型认为,这个半球
是由地球实际的物理曲率上升
并遮挡了那半边天空而形成的。
而我认为,另一方的论点
会认为这是天空与地面相交处的
一种视觉交汇,而且人类无法无限远 眺
或看穿极远的距离。
自然的视力极限意味着你最终
会无法看得更远,而天空和地面的
视觉交汇融合在一起,这
并不是因为地面的曲率。
因此,以观测者为中心的现实
就是这个模型建立的基础。
这里的以太宇宙学将你置于那个穹 顶的中心。
你选择你的坐标,你的纬度、经度,
海拔,确定你的方向,感受眼前的景 象,
然后你看着天空做出回应。
它有两个不同的层,它们之间的分离
至关重要。
首先是光学穹顶。
那是你真正抬头时所看到的
天体的视位置
就像它们从你所处的位置呈现给你 的那样。
太阳升起并划过天空时所形成的弧 线,
冬季的低新月,夏季的高新月,
如果你刚好在赤道,那就是一条对称 的线,
恒星的旋转
围绕着头顶上的极点汇聚点,
月球的路径,行星的游走
在固定的背景恒星映衬下。
这一切都以第一人称视角呈现
完全就像该坐标处的任何观察者
所看到的那样。
第二层是真实位置。
你确实需要将其开启
然后你就会看到计算出的地理位置,
它位于地球经纬网上,
这是天球在地球上的对应物。
同样,他们通常称其为地面位置,
但它首先是在天球坐标中定义的
使用赤经和赤纬
然后转换成相应的经纬度
通过一一对应的关系
即地球与天球之间的关系,
这是我们讨论过且由托勒密提出的。
而这个包含该原理的模型
向你展示了视位置
以及转换后计算出的地理位置。
所以它也是视位置
即每个航海历中的相同系统。
End of transcript · 721 words · machine translated
Original transcript (English)
Every day, no matter where you are or where you think you live, you look up and you see the sky move. The sun traces an arc across it. The stars rise in the east, wheel overhead, and then disappear in the west.
The moon follows its own path. The planets drift slowly against the background of stars. And if you stay up long enough and pay attention, you start to notice patterns, rhythms that repeat with extraordinary precision over days, months,
and years. You don't need a theory to observe any of that. You just need to look. But somewhere between that observation and the explanation for it, a set of assumptions
gets quietly inserted. A specific size for Earth, perhaps, a specific distance to the sun, a particular geometry that frames everything you're seeing before you even had a chance to ask
whether it independently fits. But if you could remove all that and start again with just the observer, that's the entire foundation of this aether cosmology conceptual model. It's built around a single observer, you,
where you're standing, what you can see from there, and the geometry of the sky as it actually appears from your position on Earth. It's something that's easy to forget. Again, every observer on Earth, regardless of where they are,
sees exactly half the sky at any given moment. Nobody sees the whole sky. Everyone sees half, a hemisphere of observation that's unique to your position and your time. The sky you see from New York tonight
is not the sky you see from Sydney. The sun they're watching set, you're watching rise. The stars visible to you are below their horizon. You each have your own dome of vision, your own apparent sky, and your own personally observable
hemisphere. The argument between the models is based around what produces that distinction. The globe argues that the hemisphere is created by physical Earth curvature coming up
and blocking out that half of the sky. And the argument from the other side, I think, would be that it's an optical convergence of where the sky meets the ground, and that humans cannot see forever and over great distances.
The natural acuity limit means that you'll eventually be unable to see any further, and the optical convergence of the sky and the ground meet, and that's not due to ground curvature. So the observer-centric reality is
what this model is built on. Aether cosmology here places you at the center of that dome. You choose your coordinates, your latitude, longitude, elevation, get your direction, you feel the view, and then you watch the sky respond.
It has two distinct layers, and the separation between them matters. First is the optical vault. That's what you see when you actually look up the apparent position of the celestial objects
as they appear to you from your location. The arc that the sun makes as it rises and crosses the sky, the low crescent in the winter, high one in the summer, symmetrical line if you happen to be exactly at the equator, the rotation of the stars
around a polar convergence point overhead, the moon's path, the wandering of the planets against the fixed background stars. All of it rendered in a first person vantage point exactly as any observer at those coordinates
would perceive it. Second layer is true positions. You do have to toggle it on and then you'll see the geographic calculated position, which is in the terrestrial sphere on the graticule,
which is the terrestrial equivalent of the celestial sphere. And again, they typically call them ground positions, but it's defined first within the celestial coordinates using right ascension declination and then translated to the appropriate latitude longitude
via the one-for-one relationship of the terrestrial to the celestial spheres we went over and put forth by Ptolemy. And this model enveloping that principle showing you the apparent
and then the transcribed calculated geographic. So it's also the apparent position that the same system every nautical almanac.