Analysis of Yemen Conflict Statements

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Welcome, everyone.

For the second consecutive time within only a month,

Saudi media is promoting a fabricated video of me

containing two statements. In the first statement, I warn the

Turkish and Pakistani governments against getting involved in the aggression against Yemen

alongside the Saudi enemy. In the second statement,

I express our welcome for any mediation toward a peaceful solution

between Saudi Arabia and Yemen, whether that mediation is Iranian

Turkish or Pakistani, considering these two statements

to express a contradiction in the Yemeni position. This is not

true. Rather, these two statements express

the steadfastness and consistency of the Yemeni position since the beginning

of the aggression against Yemen in 2015 until now.

Why? Because the first statement is a response to

statements by Turkish and Pakistani officials who expressed

their willingness to get involved in the aggression against Yemen alongside the

Saudi enemy.

The second statement is a response to statements by

Pakistani and Turkish officials

They expressed their preference for peace between Yemen

and Saudi Arabia, and their willingness to support

mediation efforts to achieve peace.

So, there is no

contradiction

in our position.

The contradiction is in the Saudi position. Why?

Because everyone knows that Saudi Arabia formed a broad international

coalition to wage aggression against Yemen. When it failed to achieve

its objectives and expressed willingness, in principle,

for a peaceful solution,

and we, in turn, also expressed willingness for a peaceful solution,

we were surprised when they said, "We are not a party to the conflict."

We said, "Then who are you?"

They said, "We're mediators." How can you be mediators when you lead

a coalition waging aggression against Yemen?

They said, "We are carrying out this aggression at Hadi's request and now at the request

of Rashad al-Alimi, therefore we are not a party."

We told them, "But today you lead a broad international coalition."

The hotel government that was led by

The hotel government that was led by

Hadi and is now led by

Rashad al-Alimi is part of this coalition that you lead,

Meaning, Riyadh had become the party

primarily involved in the conflict.

They said no, insisting they were a mediator. So we asked, how

can a peaceful solution be reached between the two sides

of a conflict when one party says, “I am not a party to the conflict.

I am a self-appointed mediator.”

We told them, “Fine,

you launched an aggression against Yemen and imposed a blockade on Yemen.

Yemen today is also striking deep inside Saudi Arabia

and imposing a blockade on Saudi Arabia, so you have become one party, and Yemen another.”

They said no, insisting they were not a party.

Fine, today we are bombing Saudi Arabia and besieging Saudi Arabia.

They said, “No. You are bombing Mecca and Medina, bombing

the Two Holy Mosques. Defending the Two Holy Mosques is not

Saudi Arabia’s responsibility alone, but that of all Islamic countries.”

Imagine that!

They want to portray it as though our problem and our Yemeni war are now with

all Islamic countries.

Fine, you

announced weeks ago that after

Yemen liberated the Bab al-Mandab region, you considered that

region, which is more than

Five thousand square kilometers as a kill box, and that you

would target any movement within it, even if it was

civilian movement, and you warned everyone.

When you began bombing, you even targeted markets

and killed civilians. When Yemen launched its painful response

against you,

you began saying that protecting Bab al-Mandab is not Saudi Arabia's responsibility,

it is the responsibility of all countries, and you want to involve them in defending you

on the grounds that you are not a party to the conflict,

but rather that you are fighting for the countries of the world and for

the Islamic world's countries and for the hotel-based legitimacy that

was

appointed by bin Salman. Just look at the extent of the contradiction.

Also, dear brothers,

months ago,

the official spokesman for

the Aggression Coalition, al-Maliki, warned

that Saudi Arabia would target Sana'a Airport

and the Iranian civilian plane if it landed at Sana'a Airport.

In response, we warned them and said that any targeting of Sana'a Airport would result in

Saudi airports being targeted.

We told them, we warned them, but don't come back complaining and crying.

They ignored our warning and bombed Sana'a Airport.

When we began to respond, they started complaining and crying.

They say targeting Saudi airports

is a crime, since they are civilian facilities that cannot

be targeted. Well, well!

So what have you been doing since the start of the aggression against Yemen in

2015 until now? You targeted all of Yemen's airports

and destroyed them, including civilian aircraft at airports,

whether owned by the Yemeni government or private companies such as Saudi Airlines.

You destroyed all Yemeni ports. Not even

mourning halls, guard facilities, hospitals,

schools, the gendarmerie center, prisons, or even cemeteries

were spared from your bombing.

Aren't these civilian facilities?

So, dear brothers, note the extent of the contradiction in the Saudi position.

As for our position, it is a steadfast one.

We say, and repeat once again:

We are for peace,

by ending the war and lifting the blockade from both sides, from

Saudi Arabia and from Yemen,

because we cannot accept the war continuing

Saudi Arabia's siege continues while Yemen is denied the right

to self-defense. This is completely unacceptable,

and we are ready for mediation by any country to achieve peace between

Yemen and Saudi Arabia,

but if Saudi Arabia rejects that, it means

that we will continue

to impose the equation of siege for siege and escalation for escalation,

and this is what we are doing,

and any country that becomes involved in the aggression against Yemen alongside Saudi Arabia,

we will punish it. Is there any contradiction in that, dear brothers?

There is no contradiction,

for we are, by nature and fundamentally, advocates of peace,

and this is our strategic choice. But if a party comes

to attack us, then we are men of war,

and if a party comes to mediate between us, we welcome it,

but if it comes and stands by the aggressor, we will punish it as we punish Saudi Arabia.

Is there any contradiction in this position, dear brothers?

There is no contradiction. Rather, this is the position of truth

and the position of justice.

Saudi Arabia today is in the position of the aggressor

Yemen is defending itself, and that's what matters to us.

The rest of the battles are details. What matters to us is that we

are

on the side of truth, whatever the results. Saudi Arabia is in

the position of aggressor. Why? Because it is the one that declared

war.

And it is the one that broke the truce this year,

2026.

And it still insists on the option of war

and rejects the option of peace, which is an

essential option for Yemen. May God's peace, mercy

and blessings be upon you.