Discussion on Historical Islamic Figures

Muawiya, may God be pleased with him, was in Syria.

No, nothing came. I mean, no sound came

from anyone. He received a woman's fingers.

He received a woman's fingers. Brothers, imagine someone knocks on your door.

You open it and find your sister's severed fingers. They sent them to you.

She was Uthman's wife, brothers, may God be pleased with him. He was his cousin and blood avenger.

his blood. And on top of that, she sent him

the bloodstained shirt and sent

him a letter in which she was weeping. What do you expect from Muawiya?

Therefore, he became extremely angry, as did Talha, al-Zubayr, and Aisha

and other Companions, may God be pleased with them, who went out to fight

those rebels. But other things happened.

They forged everything, brothers, everything they narrate.

They lie to us openly and brazenly. Then some guy who does not know who his father is comes out

just to tell you, "You have it in Bukhari."

It calls them to Hell. You have it in Bukhari. In Bukhari.

In Bukhari.

At the very least. At the very least, one should speak about these

hadiths that

the scholars have discussed. We have predecessors in discussing this hadith.

We have earlier authorities. We have people who discussed it. And people who said it is not found

in some copies of Bukhari. And that “the rebellious faction will kill him” is an addition.

And that the original hadith is about the polytheists of Quraysh. Yes, the polytheists of Quraysh call to Hell.

I agree. Woe to Ammar, he calls them to Paradise, and they call him to

Hell.

I agree, I have no problem with that. But “Woe to Ammar, the rebellious faction will kill him”

is added so that you can impugn the Prophet’s Companions, peace and blessings be upon him.

And they tell you, “No, by God, they were acting on interpretation.”

Do you even know who killed Ammar?

Abu al-Ghadiya al-Juhani, and he was a Companion. Bukhari says in Al-Tarikh al-Kabir

that he was a Companion, with an authentic chain. A Companion, a Companion.

This is if he truly killed him, because the man was 56 years old, uh...

96 years old.

Honestly, I doubt this matter. I say this to you in all candor, I doubt

Ammar’s death. Why? Because Ammar was 96

or 98 years old.

Write it down and ask how old Ammar was when he died.

You will find that he was 96, and it was also said 98.

Can a 98-year-old hold a sword?

Huh?

Can a 96-year-old hold a sword? 98 years old.

Did the Prophet take elderly people with him? Meaning, did he take older people

to war? This poor man should be sitting at home.

They'd have to see who would attend to him, how he would walk. Even his walking and eating

are slow.

Huh?

Glory be to God. Go see who killed Talha and al-Zubayr—

Your name is Muhammad. See who killed Talha and al-Zubayr.