Discussion on Historical Truth and Media

The first concerns the mechanism

for protecting historical truth. Well, given what

is happening

in the West, there really is a desire to cancel Russia,

all our citizens, you and me, and completely destroy historical

memory. You know, we used to say these words somehow

without even thinking about the

meaning of those words. And it was clear that they had

this somewhere within them. But as soon as the SMO began, it erupted in

an absolutely cynical, blatant form, I would even say,

a monstrous form, utterly perverse in some ways.

Well, what about the questions that this German journalist

asked Vučić, for example? Well,

to hell with the fact that he comes from some Nazi family.

That is, there were many Nazis in Germany,

and there still are, including

the chancellor, who clearly has distortions in his Nazi

way of thinking.

But I mean that a person, without

any embarrassment, articulates something that used to get

you’re a journalist yourself, you know this, actually driven people out of the profession,

because there is

a taboo against uttering certain formulas. You can’t speak like that.

You can think whatever you like, say something in the smoking area, but when you

ask a question like that publicly, you have to understand

that there will be an answer. And it may be different.

I won’t delve into it now, then.

I won’t wish this person any harm, but I won’t wish them well

either.