Transcript · Hindi → English
Voter Registration Issues in Karnataka
On October 5, Karnataka's Chief Electoral Officer said that using Form 7, not one
single voter was removed.
voter was removed. Not a single voter. Now look.
Today, The Hindu reports 61,000 Form 7s. Not by BJP workers,
but by the Election Commission's own officers, the EROs and AROs, and
not a single form states a reason, meaning there is no reason. A reason is legally required
to be stated. Without a reason, it is liable to be rejected, and when you check the EPIC number,
the names have already been deleted. Not only that, listen to the timeline. From August 24
to September 23, during the objection period, officers received only 1,902 Form
7s.
After the deadline, which is illegal, from September 24 to October 22, more than 60,800 Form 7s.
On October 17, 11,000. On the 19th, 11,000.
On the 21st, 10,000. On the last day, 10,000. Rule 17 says
a complaint after the deadline shall be rejected, it must be rejected, but
It wasn't canceled, names were removed, and forms were auto-generated.
The system
created them. Voters who did not receive notice were deemed ineligible. That is,
the notice was not received, so the name was removed. The judge is the ERO
and also the complainant, with a baseless complaint. The deadline
after that, 99.7 percent, and the names to be removed, before the complaint
This is not Form 7. This name was created after it was removed.
An absurd method was created. Where? BBMP South ten
Twenty-three thousand. BBMP North, eight thousand. Bangalore Urban eight thousand. The very Bengaluru where
Mahadevapura is, where Aland's SIT asked Gyanesh Kumar's
commission for data
and didn't receive it. In 26 Assembly constituencies, officers' Form 7s outnumber voters.
Yes, the commission will say this is procedural. One
point zero seven
crore have already been removed. This isn't even zero point five percent, and the CEO's five
The October statement wasn't wrong that day. Today it's old, but the pattern
Look. In Pilibhit, 13,150 names were changed on technical grounds. In Bengal
3.7 million appeals are pending. In Delhi, 4.7 million. In Karnataka, 61,000
were auto-generated. Different words in every state, different stories. The result is
the same. The names were struck off. Tomorrow, Karnataka's final roll
will come out. It won't include 61,000 names, and they won't even know
who filed the complaint, because the complainant
was their own ERO. The reason was left blank, and Gyanesh Kumar
has been silent for 18 days. So the question is, on October 5, not a single voter
was removed. By October 26, 61,000 names had been struck off, so tomorrow
what will the Commission say with the final roll?
Was the October 5 statement wrong, or is today's data?
Write in the comments. I'll definitely read it.
End of transcript · 468 words · machine translated
Original transcript (Hindi)
पांच अक्टूबर को कर्नाटका की Chief Electoral Officer ने कहा था Form 7 से एक भी voter नहीं हटाया गया। Not a single voter। अब देखिए आज The Hindu का आंकड़ा इकसठ हज़ार Form 7। BJP कार्यकर्ता ने नहीं Election Commission के अपने अफसरों ने भरे ERO और ARO और
एक भी form में कारण नहीं यानी reason नहीं है। कारण लिखना कानून में जरूरी है। बिना कारण liable to be rejected और EPIC number check करने पर नाम पहले ही कट चुके हैं। इतना ही नहीं timeline सुनिए। 24 अगस्त से 23 सितंबर objection का वक्त अफसरों के सिर्फ One thousand nine hundred two Form 7।
deadline के बाद जो कि गैरकानूनी है। 24 सितंबर से 22 अक्टूबर साठ हज़ार आठ सौ से ज्यादा। सत्रह अक्टूबर को ग्यारह हज़ार। उन्नीस को ग्यारह हज़ार। इक्कीस को दस हज़ार। आखिरी दिन दस हज़ार। Rule सत्रह कहता है deadline के बाद की शिकायत shall be rejected रद्द होगी ही लेकिन रद्द नहीं हुई, नाम कट गए और forms auto generated थे।
system ने बनाए। जिन voters तक notice नहीं पहुंचा उन्हें ineligible मान लिया गया। यानी notice नहीं मिला इसलिए नाम चला गया। जो judge है ERO वही शिकायत करने वाला, जो शिकायत है बिना कारण। जो deadline है उसके बाद Ninety nine point seven percent और जो नाम कटना था शिकायत से
पहले कट गया। ये Form 7 नहीं है। ये नाम कटने के बाद बनाया गया एक अजीबोगरीब तरीका है। कहां BBMP South दस हज़ार। BBMP North आठ हज़ार। Bangalore Urban आठ हज़ार। वही बेंगलुरु जहां महादेवपुरा है, जहां Aland की SIT ने ज्ञानेश कुमार के commission से data
मांगा और नहीं मिला। छब्बीस विधानसभा क्षेत्रों में अफसरों के Form 7 voter से ज्यादा। हां, commission कहेगा ये procedural है। One point zero seven करोड़ पहले ही हटे। ये Zero point five percent भी नहीं और CEO का पाँच अक्टूबर का बयान उस दिन गलत नहीं था। आज पुराना है लेकिन pattern
देखिए। Pilbhit में तेरह हज़ार एक सौ पचास नाम बदले technical। बंगाल में सैंतीस लाख appeals लंबित। दिल्ली में सैंतालीस लाख। कर्नाटका में इकसठ हज़ार auto generated। हर राज्य में अलग शब्द, अलग कहानी। नतीजा एक ही है। नाम कट गया। कल कर्नाटका की final raw आएगी। उसमें इकसठ हज़ार नाम नहीं होंगे और उन्हें यह भी नहीं पता होगा कि
शिकायत किसने की। क्योंकि शिकायत करने वाला उनका अपना ERO ही था। कारण खाली छोड़ गया और ज्ञानेश कुमार अठारह दिन से चुप। तो सवाल यह है पाँच अक्टूबर को एक भी voter नहीं हटाया। छब्बीस अक्टूबर को इकसठ हज़ार नाम कट चुके तो कल final raw के साथ commission क्या बताएगा?
पाँच अक्टूबर का बयान गलत था या आज का data? Comment में लिखिएगा। मैं जरूर पढ़ूंगा।
