Analysis of US-Afghanistan Relations

Different labels are pinned on them, whether along ethnic lines or

linguistic ones, all kinds of labels. They only do it for

their own benefit. If a ministry or a post is given to them,

you can be certain of this.

They will reach a deal with the Taliban in a day, even if the Taliban tell them,

"We are closing grade six, this and that, and the classes are closed too,"

they will say, "Oh, absolutely right, we agree with you

on this matter." Because the Afghan opposition,

the Afghan opposition, the political opposition,

has always proven in Afghanistan that for the sake of a post and position,

once they get a post and position, they will call what is good—

they will say that good, white things are black.

So in this regard, their—their logic, their—

their argument for Afghans, or if they want to raise

their voice, you should go and review their history to see what

Based on history, whatever history you read, based on that, their

words can be given credibility.

Now, Ashi Wahab pointed out that it is possible for

America to engage with Afghanistan so that America can also

benefit from it. As I pointed out this topic earlier,

the point here

is not that all of the Taliban's conditions will be accepted

and America will welcome them and say, "Fine."

"Whatever you say." No, engagement here is a two-way street.

Meaning America also considers its interests, and in foreign policy,

that kind of thing is the rule. That is, you must consider your own interests.

When America spent 20 years in Afghanistan,

it did not

come for God's sake, nor did its heart bleed for me, nor for any other

human being. It came only for its own interests, and once

its benefit was over, it simply walked away.