English → Persian transcript

We don't have to create opposition. There is opposition. We need to seize the opportunity. And we need to see the opportunity. And by that I mean that our CIA, along with the Israeli Mossad,

make determinations about the best way to determine who to train and arm, while at the same time we continue the economic stranglehold. And our military, along with our allies, the Israelis, provide coordinated support with targeted and supportive attacks

on the IRGC and the Basij paramilitary police. That's, in my view, how you do it. Well, Mark, you never served in the military. I know history. I know history.

Nobody alive ever served in the Civil War, either. Nobody alive ever served in the Revolutionary War, either. That's not the point. You do leave it to the experts to figure this out. But the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief,

he makes the decisions. And I look at history. I look at success. Success in destroying the Soviet Union. Success in pushing communism out of Central and South America.

And we did this. Success in pushing communism out of parts of Africa. Success in pushing the Russians, the Soviets, out of Afghanistan. We didn't send in troops. We armed the freedom fighters.

The mujahideen in Afghanistan and others throughout the world. Why would we take this off the table if the Kurds stole weapons and the Kurds have been great allies of ours everywhere around the Middle East? They are patriotic. They are pro-American.

There are other ways to do this. The question is whether our CIA is up to the task. I hope it is. I don't know anything about the bureaucracy over there. I remember William Casey, the director of the CIA under Reagan.

That man was fearless. It's something to think about quite seriously. This is how we've dealt with it in the past. Obviously, Iran's not Afghanistan. It's not Angola.

It's not Nicaragua and so forth. But as I see it, as we have all seen, the Iranian people have been more than willing than any other people to die for their liberation. They want liberation.

And I bet they want retribution against this regime for slaughtering tens of thousands of their family members and raping and torturing their young women, their daughters, their sisters, their wives, and their mothers by the tens of thousands. They just need an opportunity.

They can't do it with their bare hands. But the point is this. The only certain way to ensure that the Iranian regime can never and will never spread its revolution here in the Middle East, in Europe or anywhere else,

and all that evil and horror that goes with it, involves its elimination. No matter what President Trump does, he will be attacked by the Democrats, the media, the isolationists,

for his heroic actions against the Iranian regime. So I would ignore the Democrats and the media and the isolationists. They want failure. They will define success for them as our failure as a nation, because they are driven by a deranged mentality about politics

and exploitation for power. They are fundamentally power-hungry. We've come so far. We've made such incredible progress. Victory is in sight, in my view.

There's a gentleman by the name of Ephraim Fard. He's an expert in counter-terrorism on Iran and Middle East, based in Washington, and he writes the following in the Jerusalem Post. Moments in which internal crisis and external pressure converge at this level, he's talking about Iran, are rare,

and history suggests they don't remain open indefinitely. Previous opportunities for fundamental change were constrained by hesitation, particularly at the level of international coordination, and those constraints carry consequences.

The current moment presents a similar test, but with higher stakes and less margin for delay. If the regime survives, he writes, the ideology that defines the system will remain intact along with its patterns of behaviour

as a threat that cannot be managed indefinitely. Systems defined by this level of ideological rigidity and expansionism do not evolve into moderation. They persist until they are forced to change or cease to exist. The removal of this structure

would not only address an immediate security challenge, but would also open the possibility for a different relationship between Iran and the region, one that aligns with the emerging framework established by the Abraham Accords.

Now, to be clear, I don't have access to all the information the President has or the military and intelligence experts, but I know what I know, and I know the President of the United States,

President Trump, always has the best interests of the American people at front of mind, and that will be his guiding motivation. And frankly, I could not be prouder of our President, his team, and our military.

I could not be prouder of all of them.