Transcript · English
Discussion on HPV Vaccine and Health Risks
So please welcome Christina's mother, Emily Tarsell.
Thank you so much for being here.
First of all,
I'm so sorry about your, your daughter's death.
Thank you.
Just 21 years old. Tell us a little bit about Christina,
Emily.
She had a great curiosity about life.
She was an athlete and an artist and a philosopher.
Sounds like an outstanding person with obviously an incredibly bright
future.
Right.
Did you all decide together that she would get the HPV vaccine?
When she was 20, we went to see the GYN for her
first visit. Um, the doctor was telling us that
Gardasil would be safe and effective, would prevent cervical
cancer.
Let's talk about-
Mm
... Christina's experience. I know that
she had symptoms after each shot was administered.
What were those symptoms?
Well, because we have a case pending, I cannot go into
detail about which ha- what happened each, each time.
Um, she was previously healthy, had no existing
conditions,
um, but did, did begin to develop some things.
You know,
"Oh, I have a rash. Hmm, wonder what that's about.
Um,
I feel fatigue. I feel dizzy." And she
reported this within a few days of her
third shot,
and within 18 days, uh, of the Gardasil shot, she was found
dead in her bed.
When was the last time that you saw your daughter?
She was going back to Bard to
be trained for a job that she'd have there on campus during the
summer.
So I hugged her
and,
and I can still feel,
feel that embrace, and
I let her go,
uh, and,
and that was the last time I saw her.
You have, I know-
But-
... filed a federal claim because Gardasil
was approved by the FDA.
Why did you decide you were going to do that?
If you have reason to believe your daughter died and
from, from a product, uh, that caused her death,
you, you want to hold people accountable.
Well, we reached out to Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, and in a
statement, the company defended the vaccine, saying,
"Its safety
was established in clinical trials involving more than
25,000 females and males. They continued studying
more than 500,000 people after more than a million doses had
been administered." And the statement went on to say,
"Parents should
understand the extensive data supporting the safety profile
of Gardasil, and we encourage them to look to the CDC
and
FDA and to the advice of their own physicians to make an
informed choice about something as important as a vaccine to help
prevent cervical cancer."
Dr. Diane Harper is a professor at the
University of Louisville and an
international expert on HPV and HPV prevention.
I know, Dr. Harper, you were an integral part of the science of
bringing the
HPV vaccine into human trials. So
why initially did you think this was such a positive development for
cancer prevention?
Um, I was very excited initially because I
thought, "Yay, we have
a vaccine. This could be really important, especially in countries that don't have
any screening with it." But then I started looking at what isn't
covered, and I
looked at the fact that Gardasil doesn't last long enough to
prevent cervical cancer, and HPV infections are something women
continue to get throughout their lifetime.
The other thing that, in looking through CDC data as well
as other published data, is that HPV is most
often sexually transmitted, but between the age of birth and
11 years of age, 10 to 15% of these children are
already infected with these high-risk types.
So it isn't that you're completely negative until you're 11 years of
age, and then you're at risk, so there is an underlying infection rate
already that's there. So that makes it-
From not being s- uh, it's not from sexual activity-
It's not
... it's just because they have the virus.
There's some kind of cutaneous transmission.
It's always skin-to-skin transmission, and there's some kind of cutaneous
transmission, whether that's parental, whether that's babysitter, whether that's
bathtub, we don't know.
So are you saying that you would now not recommend
girls
or boys get the HPV vaccine?
In the concept of cervical cancer prevention, what I think is
important for people to know is that Gardasil is an option,
but that's all it is, is an option, and if you feel comfortable
that you want to take the vaccine to prevent yourself
from getting an infection for a certain amount of time, that is
your right to do. That is the benefit of taking
Gardasil, is that will happen, but as we've heard, there are also
some harms associated with it.
In your expert opinion, do the benefits outweigh the
risks?
We have Pap screening now in our new recommendations that just
came out a couple of months ago that use HPV testing
and cytology together, and those-
What's cytology? Sorry.
I'm sorry. Pap smears, cells, right.
When you go in, you get those cells scraped-
Right
... off your cervix. Um, we put those two tests together.
We have nearly 100% ability to find
pre-cancers, which can be treated at 100% cure rate,
um, and they can detect cancers. It's a much better Pap test than the one
we've had
in the past, which has not been able to detect all the
cancers, even if you
get them. So at this point, what I think that is most important for
people to understand is that Pap screening is key.
Pap screening is key to all of this.
Um, if you get the vaccine, you still have to come in for Pap
screening
because of the other HPV types that could be causing changes
in your cervix.
And with boys, uh, boys can get a number of
cancers if they have the HPV virus,
correct?
Correct. The kinds of cancers that boys can get are
anal cancer and head and neck cancer are the two,
penile cancer. All three of those cancers
occur in very low rates. NIH defines
those as rare diseases. The only exception to
that is in men who have sex with men, and in that
population, the rate of anal cancer is just as high as the rate of
cervical cancer before we had Pap testing.
But in boys, again, the efficacy is no more.
The trials lasted three years, so the long duration of
protection, if you're vaccinating somebody at 13,
may not last long
enough.
I had no idea that it only lasted for five years.
I thought it was a lifetime, uh, protection,
knowing that still Pap smears were necessary, but I didn't
realize the efficacy basically wore off after five years.
That's correct.
So when you hear about this, Emily, and you hear Dr.
Harper
say these things, how does it make you feel?
Well, it is the reason I'm here, because it's an outrage,
so that's why you have to know, and you have to take
responsibility for finding out.
Well, Emily, thank you for, for coming and talking to us about this
important topic, about your daughter, Christina, and I know it's,
must be very painful for you to do that.
But we appreciate
your being here and telling us your story and her story. And, and Dr.
Harper, thank, thanks to you as well.
End of transcript · 1,230 words · machine translated