Discussion on Resistance and Military Strategy

It is compared. There is something that should remain part of it.

Because here we can. Here.

Here, we get to Ali al-Taher. Here, we get to Ali al-Taher, that the resistance

says

the silence. You started the episode. But first,

the resistance, in confronting the enemy, did not adhere to a policy of silence.

On the contrary, the images spoke, and statements were being issued, and the Secretary-General

was speaking out, and we all went out to speak. But

we have a certain policy. The resistance has a certain policy in the field.

Okay, we issued a statement about Bint Jbeil, we didn't issue a statement about Bint Jbeil.

And my city, my dear and beloved city, and its people, and I

live in it, and

our homes are there. Okay, is Bint Jbeil more important than Ali

al-Taher?

Is Khiam more important than Ali al-Taher, so the people of the villages do not get upset?

Every village of ours, every home,

and Ali al-Taher is important. Every grain of soil is important to us in the south.

Okay, what happened at Ali al-Taher? At Ali al-Taher, there was a historic

and rare heroic epic. The Israeli enemy besieged it for three months.

How large is this hill? Let them all stay here, those who come out to talk and philosophize.

They do not know what Ali al-Tahir is. Let them go see how large it is.

And what facilities it contains. They turned it into something like strategic facilities.

The Israeli enemy considered it Hezbollah's command headquarters. That is not true.

Much of what was said about Ali al-Tahir was Israeli exaggeration, despite

the importance of Ali al-Tahir and every drop of blood

shed in Ali al-Tahir by our brothers.

It is true that we have not spoken in detail, nor have we said the number.

Nor have we said how many there were or how the Resistance fought.

This is part of the Resistance's policy and part of

its assessment that this matter should remain ambiguous.

This is not because it is unable to speak. It has its full account and its complete footage.

And there are images and scenes from

the operations carried out by the Resistance in Ali al-Tahir and elsewhere besides Ali al-Tahir

that the Resistance did not broadcast, especially in the first phase.

It believes that this footage now

does not serve a purpose. Perhaps it will at a later stage. This is part of its policy.

At Ali al-Taher, there was heroic fighting for three months.

The young men were besieged, and they were supporting him, as he said.

An Israeli wrote part of the story.

The Battle of Karbala.

The Israeli said it was part of the story, but never the whole story.

He lies about many issues to conceal the number of losses suffered

by the Israeli enemy. And he sent

others.

Others, whether from the army, perhaps mercenaries or not mercenaries, he sent them to

there, okay, and left their bodies on the ground. He left them at Ali al-Taher

and left them at al-Shaqif and Arnoun, leaving bodies because he

brought them with him. We don't know if they were human shields or mercenaries.

He left them

on the ground. Ali al-Taher has

great symbolism for the resistance in this battle.

This hill will become a landmark of the resistance.

It will also become a landmark of the resistance.

Hezbollah is in a deal. What is this nonsense? What is this nonsense

that does not deserve a response?

Regardless of our position on the army's measures north of

the Litani, because you know that south of the Litani is under the November 27 agreement

17 صفر 1. And north of the Litani, independently of

our position.

Ali al-Taher is a turning point. What comes after Ali al-Taher concerns us north of the Litani.

What is it? Regardless of our position, the army's measures, everyone who

said

why the army had not taken over, went and asked the army.

They went and asked the army.

The army refused.

Ask the army. I don't want to say what the army said.

I don't want to talk about the army because it knows what serves the interest.

What? How did you get that?

The other thing is,

there was always a question about guarantees, not from us.

We're not asking anyone.

Not the Israelis.

No, no, not the Israelis. The Americans give guarantees to the army.

The Americans don't give guarantees to the army.

They don't. Those people came out and said, even if the army took over, even if

and so on. It's all untrue. It's all untrue.

There's one particular point I don't want to go into detail about. One particular point.

But the rest is all untrue. Now, someone might come out and ask, why don't

you present your version? Perhaps a time will come when we present our version.

But we're not concerned with every interest. Not every interest.

Of course, sometimes, perhaps in good faith, some

of our friends, activists, and brothers paint

a certain picture that the resistance itself has not painted, even sometimes, some

statements. Some relied on Iranian statements.

Some relied on Lebanese statements. That's not how things are.

That's not how things are. That was not

the decision, nor did it happen that way.

Sometimes, there was this idea that after Ali al-Taher,

Ali al-Taher, a resistance position,

was fought for by the resistance with pride and honor,

valor, and martyrdom,

and the enemy was prevented for three months from taking control.

The enemy reached some points. It blew up some points and withdrew from others.

points.

What came before Ali al-Taher was like what came after Ali al-Taher.

All the media kept focusing on what came after Ali al-Taher.

What came before Ali al-Taher was like what came after Ali al-Taher, nor on what awaits us from now on.

I want to wrap up the episode with you because…