Investigation into Hospital Incident in Sweida

Our investigation reconstructs what happened inside the Suwayda hospital

An investigation by CNN Arabic, which it claims is exclusive,

reveals what happened in the Suwayda hospital during the events of July

a year ago, specifically those scenes of the killing of Muhammad Bahsas inside the hospital.

And we were able to find the missing pieces of the scene.

In short, the platform concludes that it found the missing pieces of the scene

and identified the military unit members who took control of the hospital back then,

and they are from the Khalid ibn al-Walid Brigade.

Which means accepting the narrative presented to us as self-evident,

and focusing on establishing the accusation and the identity of the members under the name of an exclusive investigation

for the killing of a medical volunteer according to international law.

While the Syrians' question was, "What about Hamza al-Amarin as a humanitarian worker according to CNN and international law?"

for the Ministry of Defense to announce a ceasefire and the withdrawal of army forces,

we were supposed to settle for clarifying a detail that the investigation overlooked

due to the Hijri militia's betrayal of the agreement concluded with the Syrian state.

And the subsequent Israeli occupation bombardment, except

that a single contradiction suddenly dragged us to the threads of a major fabrication

supported by media networks, which largely completely overthrew the hospital narrative.

The clash broke out between the officers and Mohammad Bahsas, ending with three fatal shots.

He tried to defend himself, so they quickly shot him twice, killing him.

The difference between being killed by two or three shots, especially since the talk

about the hero and central figure of the hospital incident piqued our curiosity to search for witness statements inside and outside the investigation.

Especially for this nurse, who seemed to be the most prominent witness.

And here we noticed a major discrepancy in her statements, as she says

on July 30, 2025, to a British channel,

that the security officer struck Mohammad Bahsas on his face with the butt of the rifle.

But about a month later, it seemed that the striking was without the rifle butt.

And in a third testimony 15 days ago by the nurse referred to as M.S.,

the officer assaulted Bahsas with his hand. In this testimony,

and we do not know if she is the same witness in the filmed investigation,

it seemed that there was only a single shot to the chest.

While the main witness says that the first shot was to the face and the second to the heart.

A shot to the face. And a shot to the heart.

But the second witness says that the first was to the heart and the second to the face.

And the hero shot him in his heart, and the second shot him in his face. And it ended with three fatal shots.

As for the exclusive investigation, it says three bullets. Which is like a potato auction.

Three, thirty. Three, thirty and a half.

In the science of investigation and criminal cases, a basic rule says

If a witness's statements contradict their previous ones, it raises serious questions about their credibility.

Conflicting statements lead the judiciary to doubt the witness or accuse them of fabrication and perjury.

They hit him with the rifle butt on his face.

A shot to the face and a shot to the heart. And he shot him in his heart, and the second shot him in his face. And it ended with three fatal shots.

Despite this conflict among the investigators and witnesses, it was noted in the hospital recordings that

Syrian army and security forces were looking for a specific person after being shot at from the hospital's direction, according to news sources at the time.

And their leaving of the rest was captured in a video recording as reliable evidence and documentation of it.

Consequently, the second axis of the exclusive investigation focused on exonerating Bahsas from being in

a position of criminal accusation as an armed element belonging to the Hajar militia, using hospitals and medical staff as human shields, to being a volunteer medical engineer.

Here, the exoneration comes from the testimony of the sole witness, whose credibility is legally contested, as we previously mentioned,

and the story is that he is a friend of her brother and came as a volunteer to help treat the wounded.

As for her talk about giving him a medical uniform that day, it only made the story more flimsy and weak, just like the incomplete and silent hospital recordings.

You don't stay like this, you were helping us, holding the patients or something, and our colleague was only covered in a gown to keep him dry... they hit him with the butt of a rifle on his face, meaning they hit him on his head here?

With the hand, they hit him with the butt of a rifle on his face, only covered in a gown to keep him dry because of his intestines.

We were devastated, especially me, I mean, to be honest with you.

I was sitting on the floor, saying, "That's it, we're finished." Witness

Another says that they, as nurses, were exhausted and completely devastated, but Bahsass came to boost their morale and determination.

Which logically means that this Bahsass was not part of the same exhausted and tired medical team on the ground.

I said, "That's it, we're finished."

He came in to get us up and started urging us, "No, you must get up, you were holding the patients or something," and our colleague was only covered in a gown to keep him dry.

He came in to get us up and started urging us, "No, you must get up."

The contradiction in the witnesses' testimonies raised questions once again about the rest of the hospital videos,

which the party controlling the servers seems to have intentionally hidden to cover up the crimes.

And the movements of Bahsas and the rest of the Hijr elements in the hospital corridors, while, with his engineering studies and those praises of the spirit of volunteer work, which assume him to be an initiative-taking social personality,

We tried to search for his account on social media using all names and possibilities, but

We found nothing up to the date of preparing this report, of course, so that some don't act clever and appear later with pictures of flowers and roses.

And the question is, was the delay in publishing the clipped recordings in parallel with arrangements to delete accounts, posts, and evidence?

I, of course, was among

Coincidentally, during our search, we encountered an approximate example of the so-called Yazan Abu Hadeer,

Who, as he says, is a media worker on a platform affiliated with the Hijr,

And also introduces himself as a medical volunteer in the hospital events,

Just as was said about Mohammad Bahsas.

We accessed the account of this example, and the observation was

That he has nearly 5,000 friends,

But without any activity or posts.

And the question is, how can a person have this number without posts to attract them,

Unless he deleted them recently, coinciding with his testimony as a medical volunteer?

Regarding the hospital events, while suspicions increase if we notice

his subscription to military pages of Al-Hajar, including scenes of armed elements in civilian clothes.

And of course, we do not claim it is medical, as their uniform here is a war crime in itself.

Speaking of war crimes and Al-Hijri's exclusive possession of the hospital recordings,

it seems that attempts to exploit a single scene of a single person to accuse the state

of attacking a medical volunteer are debunked for the aforementioned objective reasons,

including the scene of the assault by Bahsas, who is accused of being a soldier posing as a medical worker,

on a security officer and trying to strangle him, as shown in the only documentation.

On the other hand, Al-Hijri and his militias of remnant officers and drug traffickers are accused

of committing field executions of dozens of wounded Bedouins in the hospital.

Their concealment or destruction of the rest of the recordings is but proof,

and the shared history of these people with the defunct regime in the slaughterhouses of Tishreen Military Hospital and others

confirms that no title is absolutely sacred, which is what the international community realizes.

whom Al-Hijri and his gang are trying to outsmart, and us, with a fabricated scene of attempting to strangle

a security officer, which ended with three fatal shots

They finished him off with two bullets, leaving him with three fatal shots

By the way, the exclusive investigation is by an Egyptian journalist who works on a freelance basis, meaning on-demand

and the pay, and the nature of friendships that the research indicates are with a sick,

malicious personality belonging to Al-Hijr, who paid for its production, while

And the question for CNN, international, and human rights organizations is:

Where is the Civil Defense member and humanitarian worker, Hamza Al-Amarin,

whom Al-Hijr and his militias kidnapped about a year ago?

Al-Amarin belongs to a humanitarian organization specialized in search and rescue, and was sent on a humanitarian mission

and a UN request to evacuate a UN team from Al-Suwayda, and he is still kidnapped

and forcibly disappeared, just as the hospital recordings and the stories of hundreds of Bedouins and abductees have been hidden to this day.