Debate on Ivermectin and COVID Treatments
Attack
on ivermectin.
You had a, uh,
interview on CNN on August twenty-ninth of, uh, twenty
twenty-one,
where again, I, I just don't wanna take time to find the
exact quote.
But you know, so there's no evidence,
there's no evidence that ivermectin is helpful.
On that exact same day, and I, I, I got the,
I've got the studies right here. There was a website that was
tracking the,
the random controlled studies.
And here they are,
showing sixty, seventy percent efficacy of ivermectin.
The same day you say there's no evidence, there was all kinds of evidence.
Loved ones had to go to hospitals, had to sue hospitals.
"Just would you try it?"
So I, I wanna know, you know, to what extent were you involved in
sabotaging hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and, and did you
do that because you knew the
only, only way you'd get emergency use
authorization for these drugs,
these experimental gene therapy, was if there was no effective treatment
to get the, get the emergency use authorization?
So is that, is that why you helped sabotage
these cheap generic drugs in favor of Remdesvir? Which by the way, nurses...
Are, are you aware of the fact that nurses called it Run, Death is Near?
On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based
upon my rights
under the Fifth Amendment.
End of transcript · 229 words