讲述者称细胞培养实验对病毒学提出质疑
我们决定，我们，我们几个人，你知道 的， 决定重新做这个实验。
整个过程包括三个步骤，即细胞病变 效应、 培养、电子显微镜和基因组。
所以我们租了一家实验室。这是和我 们的朋友 斯特凡·兰卡一起做的，那说来话长 了。
所以我们采用了正在生长的细胞，对 吧， 比如这些肾细胞。
我们给它们喂食了正常的营养物质， 也加了一点点抗生素，但不多。
五天后，它们没事。
然后我们用同样的细胞，并加入了胎 牛血清， 这是自1960年以来每个培养实验都会 加入的。
为了看看是不是胎牛血清杀死了这 些细胞。
细胞没事。
好的。
然后我们做了下一个实验，也就是关 于细胞的。
我们添加了抗生素，浓度与他们在每 次培养实验中添加的相同。
我们添加了相同的营养物质，和大家 一样，相同的胎牛血清。
三天后，细胞死亡，被称为CPE，这证明 了存在病毒，而实际上根本没有病毒，也没有将任何病人的任何东西引入到实验中。
正是实验中的抗生素、营养物质或它 们的混合物杀死了细胞。
最后，我们添加了来自酵母的RNA，对 吧，就像啤酒酵母中含有大量RNA一样。
我们添加了它，它甚至杀死了更多的 细胞。
没有病毒，没有任何来自病人的东西 ，这证明了要么是抗生素，要么是营养物质，要么是胎牛血清，或者可能是添加了酵母，也许肾细胞不喜欢酵母。
但我们之所以这么做，是因为我们随 后把样本送给了一位生物统计学家， 并问他：‘那里面有新冠病毒基因组 吗？’
请记住，这里面没有任何来自病人的 东西， 但他们却找到了新冠病毒基因组。
然后我们问：‘那里面有麻疹病毒基 因组吗？’
那里面只有肾脏碎片、酵母RNA 以及胎牛血清。
他找到了麻疹病毒基因组。
他找到了艾滋病毒。
事实上，艾滋病毒是该混合物中匹配 度最高的， 这证明那些基因组根本不在混合物 中。
它们其实只是微小的RNA片段， 他们把它们拼接在一起，创建出基因 组的电脑模型。
如果你给它一个模板，它就会制造出 你让它制造的任何基因组， 只要你有一些生物材料，比如胎牛血 清、酵母RNA或肾细胞。
这就证明了， 当他们告诉你的时候，里面根本没有 基因组。
所以病毒学的三个证据就是肾细胞 死亡。
这被称为分离。
这恰恰与分离相反。
这是把脏东西加入培养物中， 然后看看它是否会死亡。
这根本不是分离。
接下来是他们看到了它的照片。
我们也看到了照片， 但结果发现那只是正在死亡的肾细 胞。
第三，他们拥有基因组。
我们也拿到了基因组，但那个混合物 里 根本没有任何病毒，或任何生病的人 的成分。
塞斯，这就是病毒学的终结。
End of transcript · 545 words · machine translated
由 TranslateMom 转录并翻译。粘贴任意视频链接，即可获得你的语言的字幕和文字稿。
Original transcript (English)
We decided, we, a bunch of us, you know, decided to run this experiment again. The whole thing with the three steps, which are the CPE, the culture, the electron microscope, and the genome. So we hired a lab. This is with our friend Stefan Lenka, who, that's a whole long story. But so we took cells that are growing, right, like these kidney cells. And we fed them the normal nutrients and we fed them a little bit of antibiotics, but not much.
Five days later, they were fine. Then we added the same cells and we added fetal calf serum, which is added to every culture experiment done since 1960. To see if it was the fetal calf serum that was killing the cells. The cells were fine. Okay.
Then we did the next experiment, which was cells. We added the antibiotics, same concentration as they add in every culture experiment. We added the same nutrients, same as everyone, the same fetal calf serum. Three days later, the cells died, called CPE, proving there was a virus when there was no virus anywhere or nothing from any sick person ever introduced into the experiment. It was the experiment that the antibiotics or the nutrients or the mix together that killed the cells.
And then finally, we added RNA from yeast, right, like brewer's yeast has a lot of RNA in it. We added that and it killed the cells even more. No virus, nothing from anybody who's sick, proving that it's either the antibiotics or the nutrients or the fetal calf serum, or maybe adding yeast, maybe kidney cells don't like yeast. But the reason we did that is then we sent that to a biostatistician type, and we said, is there a SARS-CoV-2 genome in that mix? Now remember, there was nothing from anybody who was sick, and they found the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
And then we asked, is there the measles virus genome in there? All there was was the kidney debris and the RNA from yeast and the fetal bovine serum. He found measles virus genome. He found HIV. In fact, HIV was the biggest match from that mixture, proving that those genomes aren't in the mix.
What they are is little pieces of RNA, and they stitch them together to create a computer model of a genome. And if you give it a template, it will make whatever genome you tell it to make, as long as you have some biological material like fetal calf serum or yeast RNA or kidney cells. And that proves there is no genome in there when they tell you. So the three proofs of virology are the kidney cells died. That's called isolation.
That's the opposite of isolation. That's adding crap to a culture and seeing if it dies. That's not isolation. The next is they see pictures of it. We saw pictures of it too, but there turns out they're just dying kidney cells.
Third, they have the genome. We got the genome too, but there was nothing from any virus or anybody who is sick anywhere near that mix. Seth, that is the end of virology.
