Concerns Over mRNA Vaccine Contamination

What it means is that this plasmid, contaminating plasmid

DNA indeed is getting inside the cells.

And what they're saying this means is that whoever took the mRNA vaccine,

there's a-- And if that vaccine was indeed contaminated

by the plasmid DNA, most likely such plasmid DNA would also be

entering inside

our human cells post-vaccination.

Why,

why is that really bad? Well,

because it's already been known in the past that

these SV40 viral promoters are dangerous, and the reason why

is because their presence, as it was found in the Pfizer mRNA

vaccine,

would allow such plasmid, if present inside a human

cell, to potentially enter nucleus and once inside a nucleus, then

it runs the risk of being able to integrate into the human genome.

So basically such a vaccine could then

run the risk of also acting as a

unwanted gene therapy. So much so that they

als-- they even mention, and this is the first time I've ever seen anyone

use that terminology, these authors claim that Pfizer and

BioNTech, who are the producers of the, of this vac-- mRNA vaccine,

should be held accountable for exposing

humanities to something so dangerous as

allowing mRNA shots that had

DNA con-- plasmid contamination that had that SV40 promoter

because it basically means that

the-- some individuals could run the risk then

to potentially be producing

spike protein for a long-term or permanent purpose if such a

genetic component were to integrate into the human,

human genome.

And they also reminded us is that when Pfizer released

this information to the regulatory bodies, they never ever

informed them that this SV40 enhancer and

promoter that is so dangerous was actually present as part of

the plasmid sequence. And they said there's no reason why the--

that

it should have ever been included.

All you had to do is use a basic bacterial plasmid that would allow the

bacteria to produce lots of DNAs that you could then use as a template to

produce

mRNA, which is what Moderna did. There was no reason to

ha-to have that. In fact, they were asking, they were asking

rhetorically in this paper, what was the purpose of Pfizer?

What was their intention to have that included when it's that

dangerous? So they're mentioning this is definitely,

definitely very bad news. This is the first

confirmation that we see that indeed thi-this is true,

this published

science and they-- And of course, the authors once again now, this

is numerous

authors that I've, that I've mentioned who called for the

fact that

use of these mRNA vaccines should be completely suspended until

we understand how safe or dangerous they could be in the format

that they

were used, uh, thus far.