The Myth of Giants and History

Here's something you don't learn in school.

The Smithsonian did a great job in erasing the existence of giants.

Turns out, throughout the 19th and 20th century,

finding giant skeletal remains

was extremely common across North America.

With over thousands of accounts ranging from eight to 30 feet tall, these are not

isolated events. You have newspaper archives,

archeological journals,

conquistador diaries, and countless historical accounts.

But it wasn't up until the Smithsonian Institution, with its Masonic Jesuit ties,

would repeatedly confiscate remains, steal artifacts, and bury reports

under layers of institutional denial that all of this became a myth.

Now, here's a San Diego giant that the Smithsonian bought for $500.

But they said it was just a fake, nothing to see here. So why'd you buy it?

We're told all these giant remains were just an elaborate hoax to make a

quick

buck. Of course, the natives have countless oral traditions

documenting said

giants, and they go into pretty great detail.

In fact, almost every single culture has some

legend about giants,

and many of the archeologists finding these discoveries reported strange

anatomic

anomalies such as double rows of teeth, jaw bones so large as to

fit over the face of the finder, skulls double the size of humans,

all of which were documented in virtually every state across the US all in the

same timeframe. What's even more interesting

is all the physical characteristics

described match the Biblical description of the Nephilim, the

Rephaim, the Anakim, the mighty men of old.

King Og of Bashan, one of the last of an ancient race of

giants, his bed

was said to have measured 14 feet long.

They find it very important that the nation does not realize

that the Biblical

Nephilim once lived on this soil. Now, here's a map of Europe plotting all the

finds of giants found around the same time, and as you can see, it was just as

many. Could this be why Great Britain was originally called Albion?

This name was linked to various legends about how giants were believed to be the

original founders or inhabitants of this land.

Why don't we look at Stonehenge with one of its oldest depictions?

And the interesting thing is a lot of these ancient sites across

England all have

the same name of giants associated with them.

The first name of Stonehenge was actually called the Giants Dance.

Can't make this stuff up. With many legends stating that it

was built by giants, it

wasn't called Stonehenge until a much later date.

There are so many documented accounts of people coming into contact with giants,

even in recent times. In 1520, Ferdinand Magellan came across

Patagonian giants in Argentina. They were said to have exceeded twice the

height of

a normal person, anywhere between 12 to 15 feet tall.

In 1499, Amerigo Vespucci landed in the island of

Codica, where he

also came across a tribe of native giants.

And I'm sure some of you have heard of the Kandahar giant, where in 2002 Special

Forces were said to have killed a 15-foot giant in Afghanistan.

Now, I know some people are gonna say these are just hoaxes,

but with all the

cover-ups in place, do you really think they'd disclose this

information in the

first place? Back in the day, the existence of giants

was actually common

knowledge. Even Abraham Lincoln casually wrote this

during his visit at Niagara

Falls, and I quote, "The eyes of that species of extinct giants whose

bones fill the mounds of America have gazed on Niagara as ours

do now." In summary, the Smithsonian is an independent federal agency with a

ridiculous budget from you and I that has been actively suppressing

and destroying

some of the most interesting and most important archeological

discoveries ever made

in our recent history. Same with the Vatican

and its secret archives.

All these efforts to divert people from the existence of giants and regard them as

mere myth and fairy tale, all in a matter of just a few generations.

If you know, you know.