Marxism and the Elite Paradox
Bertrand Russell, a socialist who traveled to Moscow in
1920, noticed the Bolsheviks better resembled
religious
fanatics than political theorists.
When Lenin wanted to prove a point, he'd quote Marx and Engels the way
a pastor recites scripture. In his history of Western philosophy,
Russell later laid out the rest of the parallels.
God, the active force shaping the world, becomes dialectical
materialism. Marx takes the form of the Messiah, the
elect are replaced by the proletariat, the Communist Party is the
church, the second coming is communist revolution, hell is
punishment for the capitalists, and the communist commonwealth
is portrayed
as heaven. The manifesto states that its ends can only be achieved
by, quote, "The forcible overthrow of all
existing social conditions." Marx wanted to destroy the world and
assumed his undefined heaven would arise from its ashes.
So who converts to this Marxist faith?
If Marxism is a doctrine that supposedly speaks on behalf of
the oppressed and downtrodden, why is it so often adopted
by the elites? Marx himself, while railing against the evils of the
bourgeoisie, came from an upper middle class family
that owned vineyards and
employed domestic servants. Friedrich Engels, his biggest supporter
and personal financier, drew his money from the family textile
business. Vladimir Lenin's father had attained
hereditary nobility and
his family owning property and employing servants.
Trotsky's father was a prosperous landowner in what is now Ukraine.
Mao Zedong's family was considerably better off than ordinary
Chinese
peasants. Fidel Castro's family had a large estate.
Che Guevara was born into a relatively affluent family.
Pol Pot's family had unusually strong connections to the Cambodian
royal court, and he came across Marxist doctrine
while studying
abroad in Paris. All of these well-off men would go on to
create, support, or lead revolutions that killed millions of the people
they claimed to represent. But this is not an accident, and
Marx said so himself. The manifesto explains that, quote, "A
portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat and, in
particular, a portion of bourgeoisie ideologists who
have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the
historical movement as a whole." He wrote an excuse for his own
class position into the founding text.
Lenin built on this notion, arguing that workers left to
themselves only reach trade union consciousness,
supposing that socialist theory has to be instilled in them from the
outside by educated elites, what he would call the vanguard.
Marxist thought leaders admit the workers were never the ones who came
up with it. So while the common narrative is
that Marxism and
communism are doctrines for the benefit of the poor, the men who built
and led them were almost without exception the elite.
End of transcript · 458 words