DOJ Responds to Question About Epstein Files and Alleged Abusers

Uh, thank you. Um, um, you said this is the end of the Epstein, uh, of your review of the Epstein files. So just to clarify, are... Is the public going to learn the identities of the men who abused the girls with the information that you're releasing? And if not,

why not? And then I have a quick follow-up.

I mean, you just baked in an assumption into your question that I have never said and I don't know to be true. Is the public going to learn about men that abused these girls? Like, what does that mean?

I- I don't understand what that means. Well, I mean, they're the men who abused the young women, uh, through Epstein's, um, through Epstein- Look, we, we said in July, um, and it remains as true today as it was in July, um, if we had information, we meaning the Department of Justice, about men who abused women,

we would, um, we would, we would prosecute them, right?

We talked about the work that we're doing, that's why I said that. There's the...

I said this earlier. There's this built-in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of information of men that we know about that we're covering up or that we're not, we're choosing not to prosecute.

That is not the case. I don't know whether there are men out there that abused these women-